Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this spec living? #159

Open
foolip opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Is this spec living? #159

foolip opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Oct 3, 2017

I noticed when playing with https://foolip.github.io/day-to-day/ that Loader hasn't had any activity in the last 8 weeks, and in fact there is no directory in web-platform-tests. I'm wondering if I should exclude it or not.

I don't know this space very well, but is this something that would be implemented in JS engines, or on top of them? Is there any implementer interest?

Whatever the state of the document is, making its status clear (in the spec itself) would be great.

@caridy
Copy link
Contributor

caridy commented Oct 5, 2017

I'm wondering if I should exclude it or not.

exclude it.

Whatever the state of the document is, making its status clear (in the spec itself) would be great.

https://github.com/whatwg/loader#status

@caridy caridy closed this as completed Oct 5, 2017
@foolip
Copy link
Member Author

foolip commented Oct 8, 2017

Thanks, I'll exclude it! I was hoping that the spec itself (https://whatwg.github.io/loader/) would say something about its status, as certainly I would never go looking at the GitHub repo looking for such information.

@rektide
Copy link

rektide commented Feb 3, 2018

I was recently pointed to whatwg/html#3161 , which is an attempt to define mappings to allow bare specifiers. That in particular is the use case I'm hoping to see advanced, so I can make use of some of the half-a-million modules in the browser.

That thread also linked to another older general discussion thread on request hooks, whatwg/html#2640

@stevenvachon
Copy link

stevenvachon commented Apr 18, 2019

I've been told that it's completely abandoned. The repository's dates would reflect this.

@matthewp
Copy link

Last I heard, @caridy is concentrating on Realms as that's needed before they can proceed with this: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-realms

@caridy
Copy link
Contributor

caridy commented Apr 18, 2019

part of this is now solved by import() and imports map. the other part will be feed into the realms proposal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants