-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistent relation between storage container terms and mapping #100
Comments
Correcting myself: it seems a storage bucket may additionally have a "mode", if it is a local storage bucket, which might explain the has-a instead of is-a relationship. Storage shelf is associated with a "storage usage" and a "storage quota", but it's not clear if these are properties of the storage shelf, or associated with it in some external way. |
We might be able to flatten storage shelf, yeah. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
On the one hand,
but:
and:
Why is it that a storage shed "is" a map, while a storage shelf "holds" a map, and a storage bucket "has" a map? Storage shelves and storage buckets do not appear to have any other properties besides the map. So this seems inconsistent. Why do "bucket map" and "bottle map" exist as separate concepts at all?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: