Wrong order for target variable names in Paper_Figures.ipynb

[amullen01]

To my understanding the naming convention for target variables is {variable}{compartment}{pft} e.g. VEGC00 = leaf VEGC for PFT0, VEGC22 = root VEGC for PFT2.

For SA, the outputs for target variables (output.txt) are ordered by PFT first, then compartment.
example: VEGC00, VEGC10, VEGC20, VEGC10, VEGC11, VEGC12

In Paper_Figures.ipynb and it looks like some of the other plotting scripts, the output.txt file is being read and columns are being set ordered by compartment then PFT, whereas it should be the other way around.

I don't think this is affecting results, just the plot x labels.

If someone could double check this to confirm, I can make an adjustment in Paper_Figures.ipynb when I push my results.

[aiza-k]

I checked this, and yes our SA results are ordered by pft, then compartment. What we're plotting is ordered pft 0 leaf, pft 0 stem, pft 0 root, and so on.

We actually don't have any documentation for naming convention that I can find. I was thinking it actually was {variable}{pft}{compartment}, but that might be wrong. @Elchin can you confirm?