-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hi,how about OpenStack predict? #11
Comments
You should parse all the OpenStack logs, make session windows based on PID and train the LSTM model on normal logs. Afterwards, you can try and check if you can detect abnormal logs as the dataset is labelled. |
Hi. I also want to try openstack data. According to the paper the labels for openstack data are based on instance_id. However, most of the raw logs from https://www.cs.utah.edu/~mind/papers/deeplog_misc.html don't contain instance_id. Do you have any idea? Thanks. |
Hi , I met the same problem when parsing OpenStack dataset. Besides, even though I made session windows on logs with instance id, the abnormal sequences are similar to most of the normal sequences. How do you solve the problem? @bolzzzz |
Have you deal with this problem? Thanks a lot |
hi,
your hdfs__data is very perfect,how about openstack?Because of the paper,there are two parts of deeplog,could you help me?Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: