v0.4.0 Testing Feedback #391
Replies: 5 comments 18 replies
-
Was |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Following code was working okay in v0.3.3 but reporting the following error in v0.4.0, which I am curious if the following behavior is expected / desired or if it is a bug. mod_file = "cmip6.historical.E3SMv2.r1i1p1.mon.pr.198101-200512.AC.v20221027_test2-regridded.nc" # xCDAT calculated AC and regridded
dm_x = xc.open_dataset(mod_file, data_var="pr")
dm_x.temporal.average(var)
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just confirming that v0.4.0 update resulted no change in the PMP mean climate statistics (bias, rmse, correlation, standard deviation, etc), which is GREAT because we don't want these numbers changing with the newer version! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi all, I am a recent xcdat user. I've encountered a specific problem temporal averaging a dataset with a fixed-frequency cftime axis which seems related to the calendar issue discussed here. I am examining monthly data from ERSST:
I change the time to a fixed-frequency cftime range (to allow for comparison with other datasets in my project): Sseasonal averaging works fine with the original time axis (not shown), but attempting to take a seasonal average of the modified fixed-cftime-frequency dataset results in an error:
I just wanted to check if the error with the modified axis is a bug, or if I am pushing the software to the limit. Thanks much, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's a good example where some equivalent of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Discussion related to v0.4.0
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions