Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spconv vs torchsparse #60

Open
SandeepMenonKodiak opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

spconv vs torchsparse #60

SandeepMenonKodiak opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@SandeepMenonKodiak
Copy link

Hi
Thank you for consolidating SPVCNN and MinkowskiNet along with your work.
I wanted to ask if you tried implementing your model using torchsparse. Any reason for choosing spconv (featurewise or performance wise).
In your codebase I see SparseSequential, SparseConvTensor, SubMConv3d from spconv. They can be substituted in theory by torchsparses' Sequential, SparseTensor and Conv3D.
Wanted to know any thoughts on that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant