-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error accessing server with SAML. Signature signing problem #378
Comments
Is the log collected from the VPN server side? |
And is the client broken now? |
Yes... server side log... It's funny that I can connect after several attempts. Using the "default browser" option has solved most of the problems I have always had. I understand that the server has qualms with something that is not its official client. |
I finally can connect... after a couple of tries. Taking into account that I have just launched a command, copied a cookie, pasted a command with a cookie... and waited for the correct connection, keeping the terminal always open. A proposal, I always have to modify the routing tables, eliminate the one that creates the connection so that all traffic goes through the VPN and route only the IP range that interests me... Networkmanager allows modifying the routes imposed by the server , For example. It worked very well until SAML was implemented... I could never use it to connect again |
The client delegates the SAML authentication to the external browser/webview. and intercept the cookies/tokens to connect to the VPN server. It does no special handling for the SAML authentication. I assume the error message on the server side may not be specific to this client.
I'm interested in supporting this |
Hello! Great software, it has changed my life since I discovered it.
It has always been a Greek epic to connect to my company's Globalprotect server from Linux.
The thing is that everything has been working perfectly for the last few months, but now I find this:
org.opensaml.saml.common.SAMLException: No signature signing parameter is available
Has anyone found it? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: