You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At @YDB we also forked benchbase to implement TPC-C. Now we both share same bugs :)
Here you always iterate from 1 to terminalDistrictUpperID. It seems that original approach was either to iterate from terminalDistrictLowerID (left unused) to terminalDistrictUpperID. It means that first terminal iterates districts from 1 to 2, next terminal - 1 to 3, ..., 1 to 10. But each terminal should iterate 1 to 10 according the standard (and I double checked TPC-C implementation in CockroachDB).
At YDB bugfix decreased tpmc by 4%. In my opinion, this bug is critical, because all TPC-C results published are not accurate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi folks,
At @YDB we also forked benchbase to implement TPC-C. Now we both share same bugs :)
Here you always iterate from 1 to
terminalDistrictUpperID
. It seems that original approach was either to iterate fromterminalDistrictLowerID
(left unused) toterminalDistrictUpperID
. It means that first terminal iterates districts from 1 to 2, next terminal - 1 to 3, ..., 1 to 10. But each terminal should iterate 1 to 10 according the standard (and I double checked TPC-C implementation in CockroachDB).At YDB bugfix decreased tpmc by 4%. In my opinion, this bug is critical, because all TPC-C results published are not accurate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: