You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On a recent data call, there was a request to avoid "re-creating dim tables" repeatedly, but rather to use more "IN" clauses or other alternative constructs. This would affect approximately lines 1–2002 of Lung.sql and lines 1–1636 of Fobt.sql. The change would result in far fewer CREATE TABLE and INSERT INTO lines. It would also mean a radical change in the current structure of the code base.
On a recent data call, there was a request to avoid "re-creating dim tables" repeatedly, but rather to use more "IN" clauses or other alternative constructs. This would affect approximately lines 1–2002 of
Lung.sql
and lines 1–1636 ofFobt.sql
. The change would result in far fewerCREATE TABLE
andINSERT INTO
lines. It would also mean a radical change in the current structure of the code base.instruct-project-etrigger-sql/Lung.sql
Line 201 in 0b4d07d
instruct-project-etrigger-sql/Fobt.sql
Line 219 in 0b4d07d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: