Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate caching issue in API Catalog with description metadata #3692

Open
pablocarle opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Investigate caching issue in API Catalog with description metadata #3692

pablocarle opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Verified defect in functionality good first issue Good for newcomers Priority: Medium

Comments

@pablocarle
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
If a service does not change ID and updates description metadata, i.e. apiml.catalog.tile.description and/or apiml.service.description, API Catalog may show the cached description unless recycled.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Onboard service with one description in metadata. Verify it shows in the service detail page in API Catalog
  2. Update description in metadata and recycle onboarded service.
  3. Verify if new description appears in all fields.

Expected behavior
Description should be updated.

@pablocarle pablocarle added bug Verified defect in functionality good first issue Good for newcomers new New issue that has not been worked on yet labels Aug 20, 2024
@pablocarle
Copy link
Contributor Author

This behaviour was noted in the testing v3 instance but it's likely also present in v1 / v2

@balhar-jakub balhar-jakub added Priority: Medium and removed new New issue that has not been worked on yet labels Aug 21, 2024
@taban03
Copy link
Contributor

taban03 commented Aug 27, 2024

Related to #1145

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Verified defect in functionality good first issue Good for newcomers Priority: Medium
Projects
Status: Unplanned Bugs
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants