Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Other fixes (#133)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
gganis authored May 11, 2023
1 parent 5670519 commit a7cc6d8
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions fast-sim-and-analysis/FccFastSimGeneration.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ Running will take a few minutes. Among the last lines of the output there should
| |
*------- End PYTHIA Event and Cross Section Statistics ----------------------------------------------------------*
```
i.e. 1467.0 +- 7.8 (1458.0 +- 7.7) pb.
i.e. 1458.0 +- 7.7 pb.


### Generating ditaus with Whizard
Expand All @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ The taus are not decayed. We need another solution for that.

:::

The first lines of the `LHEf` file give the total cross-section: 1502 +- 2 pb 1.508 +- 2 pb, which seems definitely higher than the others.
The first lines of the `LHEf` file give the total cross-section: 1.508 +- 2 pb, which seems definitely higher than the others.

#### `LHEf` to `EDM4hep` conversion

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ $ tail -37 kk/KKMCee-24Apr2023-060444/pro.output
********************************************************************************
```
i.e the total ditau cross-section at 91.2 GeV from `KKMCee` is 1485.2 +- 7.0 pb .
i.e the total ditau cross-section at 91.2 GeV from `KKMCee` is 1485.5 +- 0.007 pb .

#### `HepMC` to `EDM4hep` conversion

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -975,5 +975,5 @@ Think of your own. Expand for a possible one.
:::{admonition} Hint
:class: toggle

The distributions show a lot of similarities, which means that for detector optimisation studies the choice of the generator probably won't matter. However, the total cross-section is significantly different, so for studies where exact calculations matter more, the `KKMCee`, which is expected to be the most accurate of the three, seems the choice to go.
The distributions show a lot of similarities, which means that for detector optimisation studies the choice of the generator probably won't matter. However, the total cross-section is significantly different, so for studies where exact calculations matter more, the `KKMCee` seems the choice to go, because it is the only one giving the total cross-section compatible with experiment (ALEPH at 91.197 GeV gave 1.4771 ± 0.0066± 0.0027 pb).
:::

0 comments on commit a7cc6d8

Please sign in to comment.