-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Payments #9
Draft
BryceStevenWilley
wants to merge
39
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
payments
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Payments #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
BryceStevenWilley
force-pushed
the
payments
branch
from
August 30, 2023 21:38
609f46f
to
53f7253
Compare
* validation on delivery methods if someone is e-filing * overwrite some of the default payment options, like allowing people to create a fee waiver or showing the global option here * wording changes on "How to send Appearance" and elsewhere
* further explain payment methods, particularly Bank account * add links to ILAO articles and other EFSPs * small grammer fixes
Uses the exclude option to avoid limited counsel stuff
Have officially gotten word from the courts in this PR that they: > want filers to upload an appearance form as a Lead Document and then use the additional/optional services associated with that Lead Document to indicate their jury demand (6, 12, or 12 after 6 has already been paid). The additional/optional service should match the case type they are filing into (SC, PR, P, and GR have different jury demand fees), and filers should use this process even if they file with a fee waiver Consolidated this list so we only need to update it one place.
Had misread earlier emails about which courts we want to add to the list; just going to add all of them. The ones added this PR we haven't gotten official confirmation from yet, but still have Jury demaind optional services available.
BryceStevenWilley
force-pushed
the
payments
branch
from
October 16, 2023 15:33
72bc3c8
to
fdcedfb
Compare
When the case name is longer than just "small claims".
At request of ILAO
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Leaving this a draft until we're ready!
Tests aren't passing, will take a look soon.