Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to pregenerated bindings #28

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

coastalwhite
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR replaces #25 and proposes a way to properly handle having both a Linux-PAM and OpenPAM implementation.

Although, I would like to change some things. Notably having the constants in both modules exposed no matter which implementation is selected. It does show the general architecture. I would be curious as to what you think about this architecture.

@honsunrise
Copy link

Hi,
The PR is still in progress?

@1wilkens
Copy link
Owner

1wilkens commented Oct 6, 2024

Good question, I am the bottleneck as I (currently) cannot dedicate time to either pam or pam-sys and consequently did not look at the PR.
This really stresses me out as I really would like this library to be well maintained.

@coastalwhite I already added you as a collaborator. Do you feel confident (and are still interested?) to take over as maintainer of these two crates? Feel free to just make changes as you see fit and eventually we can transfer over the repositories to your account if you so desire.

If you have additional thoughts on this, feel free to mail me gh@1wilkens.org so we can hash this out.

Cheers,
Florian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants