Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Elsje S - Snow Leopards #112

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

elsjeslothower
Copy link

Disclaimer: I couldn't get the timeStamp prop/component to work the way I wanted it to, so I focused on the other aspects of the project. Will keep working on it until I understand!

Copy link

@marciaga marciaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work! I left specific comments below. In general, the structure is good but use caution when passing props to ensure names align!


const calcTotalLikes = (chatData) => {
let everyHeart = '❤️'
let numberOfHearts = 0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job with this calculation! Here's another way to write this that doesn't necessitate a variable outside the scope of the reduce:

return chatData.reduce((count, chat) => {
  if (chat.liked) {
    count += 1;
  }
  return count;
}, 0);

Then you also don't have to do the formatting in the template string and you can do it in the JSX instead.

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
// "avoidEscape": true;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can just delete this commented out code.

<header className="App-header">
<h1>Ghibli Jabber</h1>
<section>
<h2 className="likes-counter" >Likes: {displayTotalLikes}</h2>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following up on the earlier comment, I mean you can do this if you follow the reduce pattern I laid out:

<h2 className="likes-counter" >Likes: {displayTotalLikes} ❤️s</h2>

Which will help your tests to pass as well.

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ describe('Wave 03: clicking like button and rendering App', () => {
let buttons = container.querySelectorAll('button.like')

// Act
fireEvent.click(buttons[0])
fireEvent.click(buttons[5])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's no need to modify the tests here and doing so could cause false positives/negatives unexpectedly.

import ChatEntry from './ChatEntry';
import './ChatLog.css';

const ChatLog = (entries) => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The expected name for the argument passed to a React component is props

);
});
};
return <div className="chat-log">{getChatLogJSX(entries.chats)}</div>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I see where the confusion about entries is. Chatlog is supposed to be passed a prop called entries and those entries are the chat objects. So you'd pass props.entities to the getChatLogJSX function. This is another reason why your tests weren't passing for this component.

<p className="entry-time">Replace with TimeStamp component</p>
<button className="like">🤍</button>
<p>{props.body}</p>
<p className="entry-time">{props.timeStamp}</p>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The usage you're looking for is (first uncomment the Timestamp component import on line 4. Then this line:

        <p className="entry-time"><TimeStamp time={props.timeStamp}/></p>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants