Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snow Leopards - Anika SW #133

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Snow Leopards - Anika SW #133

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

anika-sw
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@yangashley yangashley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work on react chat log!

Let me know if you have any questions about my comments

Comment on lines +18 to +20
useEffect(() => {
setChatEntryData(chatMessages);
}, []);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of using useEffect here to set the values for chatEntryData on page load, you can omit this completely and directly set the state on line 8. That would look like:

  const [chatEntryData, setChatEntryData] = useState(chatMessages);

setChatEntryData(chatMessages);
}, []);

const [likesCount, setLikesCount] = useState(0);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should always be on the lookout for whether we need to create state or not. Creating additional pieces of state adds complexity to a project. When possible, we should prefer to calculate values instead of using state to keep track of it.

To remove the state likesCount you'd need to have a method like calculateLikesCount that iterates over chatEntryData and adds up the likes from each message:

const calculateLikesCount = (chatEntryData) => {
    return chatEntryData.reduce((total, message) => {
      return message.liked ? (total += 1) : total;
    }, 0); 
};

const updatedEntries = chatEntryData.map(entry => {
if (entry.id === updatedEntry.id) {
if (updatedEntry.liked === true) {
setLikesCount((likesCount) => likesCount + 1);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the total number of likes can be found without introducing state, this line can be removed.

Comment on lines +11 to +21
const toggleLikeButton = (event) => {
const updatedChatEntry = {
id: props.id,
sender: props.sender,
body: props.body,
timeStamp: props.timeStamp,
liked: !props.liked
}
setIsMessageLiked(!isMessageLiked);
props.onHandleLikes(updatedChatEntry);
};

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're already keeping track of chatEntryData in app.js (updateChatEntryData on line 24) so we should keep all chatEntryData logic in app.js instead of having it in different components which makes the code hard to maintain. It's easier to remember that everything is in app.js (instead of having to check each component to see if make changes to chatEntryData). In industry, an application could have hundreds of components so keeping logic organized is important.

We also discussed lifting up state in the Learn readings. Here, we can lift up the like state out of ChatEntry and into App.js to follow this pattern of lifting state up.

This means toggleLikeButton should live in app.js and get passed down to ChatEntry as a prop. So you'd have a method like toggleLike in app.js:

const toggleLike = (id) => {
    setChatData((chatData) =>
    chatData.map((message) => {
      if (message.id === id) {
        return {...message, liked: !message.liked};
      } else {
        return message;
      }
    })
    );
  };

and then your onClick event handler on line 29 below would look like:

onClick={() => props.toggleLike(props.id)}


const fullChatLog = props.entries.map((entry, index) => {
return (
<li key={index}>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should only use index for the key prop when we do not have an object ID, use index as a last resort. Since you have entry.id, use that id for key instead here


return (
<div className="fullChatLog">
{fullChatLog}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While Learn does show using a variable to reference the return value from calling .map() and then using the variable in the JSX like you've done here, I did want to call out that you'll see another, more common way of writing code that iterates over a list of objects:

return (
    <ul>
        {props.entries.map.((entry, index) => {
            <li key={index}>
            <ChatEntry
                id={entry.id}
                sender={entry.sender}
                body={entry.body}
                timeStamp={entry.timeStamp}
                liked={entry.liked}
                onHandleLikes={props.onUpdateLikes}>
            </ChatEntry>
            </li> 
            }
        }
)

<p className="entry-time">Replace with TimeStamp component</p>
<button className="like">🤍</button>
<p>{props.body}</p>
<p><TimeStamp time={props.timeStamp}></TimeStamp></p>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice use of the provided TimeStamp component to properly display the time

<p>{props.body}</p>
<p><TimeStamp time={props.timeStamp}></TimeStamp></p>
<button className="like" onClick={toggleLikeButton}>
{props.liked ? '❤️' : '🤍'}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

return (
<div id="App">
<header>
<h1>Application title</h1>
<h1>Rockin' React Chat Log!</h1>
<h2>{likesCount} ❤️</h2>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of using likesCount here, you'd invoke your helper method that calculates the likes

<h2>{calculateLikesCount()} ❤️</h2>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants