Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev-petros - Branch Optimization #20

Merged
merged 134 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

dev-petros - Branch Optimization #20

merged 134 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

ptoupas
Copy link
Collaborator

@ptoupas ptoupas commented Nov 4, 2023

No description provided.

@@ -76,4 +79,67 @@ def plot_percentage_resource_per_layer_type(self, output_path=None):
if output_path == None:
plt.show()


def visualise_partitions_nx(self, output_path):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is already a "visualise" function in Network.py, and I am not sure how they are different

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I created this one before seeing that there was another one doing the same thing.
In any case, the original Network visualise function depends on the visualise functions for each layer of the graph, which are not always implemented and are currently a bit buggy.
I kept this one as I need to check the partitions and how they are structured (mostly as a debugging tool).
We might drop this before merging, BUT we need to fix the other one in that case.

fpgaconvnet/models/network/Network.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fpgaconvnet/models/partition/update.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
fpgaconvnet/models/partition/update.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AlexMontgomerie
Copy link
Owner

Are we happy to merge this, even if it is failing tests at the moment?

@ptoupas ptoupas merged commit 997f2fc into dev Feb 9, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants