-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev-petros - Branch Optimization #20
Conversation
Removed update_io_ports from update_partitions of Network class
…ting of a graph in split_graph_vertical
…Chop prototxt nodes
…d Partition classes respectively
@@ -76,4 +79,67 @@ def plot_percentage_resource_per_layer_type(self, output_path=None): | |||
if output_path == None: | |||
plt.show() | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def visualise_partitions_nx(self, output_path): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there is already a "visualise" function in Network.py, and I am not sure how they are different
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I created this one before seeing that there was another one doing the same thing.
In any case, the original Network visualise function depends on the visualise functions for each layer of the graph, which are not always implemented and are currently a bit buggy.
I kept this one as I need to check the partitions and how they are structured (mostly as a debugging tool).
We might drop this before merging, BUT we need to fix the other one in that case.
…ling due to really small number of weights and bram/uram usage being 0
… streaming feature support
…ess functions. Changed the implementation to take into consideration a broader pool of cases regarding the connections in branches
3D support and fixes on pipeline depth calculation
Are we happy to merge this, even if it is failing tests at the moment? |
No description provided.