chore: cleanups

.github/workflows/make-epub.yml

@@ -21,32 +21,3 @@ jobs:
           sed -i 's/vertical-rl/horizontal-tb/g' OEBPS/Styles/*.css
           sed -i 's/page-progression-direction="rtl"/page-progression-direction="ltr"/g' OEBPS/content.opf
           zip -r sikutiyao.epub META-INF mimetype OEBPS
-
-      - name: Sync to Onedrive
-        uses: wei/rclone@v1
-        env:
-         RCLONE_CONF: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONF }}
-         RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS }}
-        with:
-          args: copyto sikutiyao.epub onedrive:/古籍共享电子书计划/四庫提要.epub
-      - name: Sync vst to Onedrive
-        uses: wei/rclone@v1
-        env:
-         RCLONE_CONF: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONF }}
-         RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS }}
-        with:
-          args: copyto sikutiyao-vst.epub onedrive:/古籍共享电子书计划/四庫提要-豎排.epub
-      - name: Sync to Onedrive
-        uses: wei/rclone@v1
-        env:
-         RCLONE_CONF: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONF }}
-         RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS }}
-        with:
-          args: copyto sikutiyao.epub onedrive:/古籍共享电子书计划/四庫提要.epub
-      - name: Sync vst to Onedrive
-        uses: wei/rclone@v1
-        env:
-         RCLONE_CONF: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONF }}
-         RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS: ${{ secrets.RCLONE_CONFIG_PASS }}
-        with:
-          args: copyto sikutiyao-vst.epub onedrive:/古籍共享电子书计划/四庫提要-豎排.epub

OEBPS/Text/0100601.html

@@ -12,6 +12,6 @@
 </h2>
 <!--ed:-->內府刊本
 <p>
-<!--no:-->宋歐陽修撰。本名<span class="shuminghao">新五代史記</span>。世稱<span class="shuminghao">五代史</span>者。省其文也。<span class="jiaozhusup">案：彚訂本一四九八頁據黃永年<span class="shuminghao">唐史史料學</span>：「<span class="shuminghao">中興書目</span>、<span class="shuminghao">郡齋讀書志</span>及傳世宋、元刻本下至明汪文盛本、南監本均作<span class="shuminghao">五代史記</span>。本名<span class="shuminghao">新五代史記</span>云云，純系杜撰。」</span>唐以後所修諸史。惟是書爲私撰。故當時未上於朝。修歿之後。始詔取其書。付國子監開雕。遂至今列爲正史。大致襃貶祖<span class="shuminghao">春秋</span>。故義例謹嚴；敍述祖<span class="shuminghao">史記</span>。故文章高簡。而事實則不甚經意。諸家攻駁。散見他書者無論。其特勒一編者。如吳縝之<span class="shuminghao">五代史纂誤</span>、楊陸榮之<span class="shuminghao">五代史志疑</span>。引繩批根。動中要害。雖吹求或過。要不得謂之盡無當也。然則薛<span class="shuminghao">史</span>如<span class="shuminghao">左氏</span>之紀事。本末賅具。而斷制多疎；歐<span class="shuminghao">史</span>如<span class="shuminghao">公</span>、<span class="shuminghao">穀</span>之發例。襃貶分明而傳聞多謬。兩家之竝立。當如三<span class="shuminghao">傳</span>之俱存。尊此一書。謂可兼賅五季。是以名之輕重爲史之優劣矣。且<span class="shuminghao">周官</span>太史掌國之六典。漢法亦天下計書先上太史。史之所職。兼司掌故。八書、十志。遷、固相因。作者沿波。遞相撰述。使政刑禮樂。沿革分明。皆所謂國之大紀也。修作是書。僅<span class="shuminghao">司天</span>、<span class="shuminghao">職方</span>二考。寥寥數頁。餘概從删。雖曰世衰祚短。文獻無徵。然王溥<span class="shuminghao">五代會要</span>蒐輯遺編。尚裒然得三十卷。何以經修編錄。乃至全付闕如？此由信<span class="shuminghao">史通</span>之謬談。<span class="jiazhu">劉知幾欲廢表、志。見<span class="shuminghao">史通</span>表歷、書志二篇</span>。成茲偏見。元纂宋、遼、金三史。明纂<span class="shuminghao">元史</span>。國朝纂<span class="shuminghao">明史</span>。皆仍用舊規。不從修例。豈非以破壞古法。不可以訓乎？此書之失。此爲最大。若不考韓通之襃贈。<span class="jiazhu">案宋太祖褒贈韓通敕。今載<span class="shuminghao">宋文鑑</span>中。</span>有所諱而不立傳者。一節偶疎。諸史類然。不足以爲修病也。修之文章。冠冕有宋。此書一筆一削。尤具深心。其有裨於風教者甚大。惟其考證之疎。則有或不盡知者。故具論如右。俾來者有所別白。其註爲徐無黨作。頗爲淺陋。相傳已久。今仍竝錄之焉。<br/>
+<!--no:-->宋歐陽修撰。本名<span class="shuminghao">新五代史記</span>。世稱<span class="shuminghao">五代史</span>者。省其文也。<span class="jiaozhusup">案：彚訂本一四九八頁據黃永年<span class="shuminghao">唐史史料學</span>：「<span class="shuminghao">中興書目</span>、<span class="shuminghao">郡齋讀書志</span>及傳世宋、元刻本下至明汪文盛本、南監本均作<span class="shuminghao">五代史記</span>。本名<span class="shuminghao">新五代史記</span>云云，純系杜撰。」</span>唐以後所修諸史。惟是書爲私撰。故當時未上於朝。修歿之後。始詔取其書。付國子監開雕。遂至今列爲正史。大致襃貶祖<span class="shuminghao">春秋</span>。故義例謹嚴；敍述祖<span class="shuminghao">史記</span>。故文章高簡。而事實則不甚經意。諸家攻駁。散見他書者無論。其特勒一編者。如吳縝之<span class="shuminghao">五代史纂誤</span>、楊陸榮之<span class="shuminghao">五代史志疑</span>。引繩批根。動中要害。雖吹求或過。要不得謂之盡無當也。然則薛<span class="shuminghao">史</span>如<span class="shuminghao">左氏</span>之紀事。本末賅具。而斷制多疎；歐<span class="shuminghao">史</span>如<span class="shuminghao">公</span>、<span class="shuminghao">穀</span>之發例。襃貶分明而傳聞多謬。兩家之竝立。當如三<span class="shuminghao">傳</span>之俱存。尊此一書。謂可兼賅五季。是以名之輕重爲史之優劣矣。且<span class="shuminghao">周官</span>太史掌國之六典。漢法亦天下計書先上太史。史之所職。兼司掌故。八書、十志。遷、固相因。作者沿波。遞相撰述。使政刑禮樂。沿革分明。皆所謂國之大紀也。修作是書。僅<span class="shuminghao">司天</span>、<span class="shuminghao">職方</span>二考。寥寥數頁。餘概從删。雖曰世衰祚短。文獻無徵。然王溥<span class="shuminghao">五代會要</span>蒐輯遺編。尚裒然得三十卷。何以經修編錄。乃至全付闕如。此由信<span class="shuminghao">史通</span>之謬談。<span class="jiazhu">劉知幾欲廢表、志。見<span class="shuminghao">史通</span>表歷、書志二篇</span>。成茲偏見。元纂宋、遼、金三史。明纂<span class="shuminghao">元史</span>。國朝纂<span class="shuminghao">明史</span>。皆仍用舊規。不從修例。豈非以破壞古法。不可以訓乎。此書之失。此爲最大。若不考韓通之襃贈。<span class="jiazhu">案宋太祖褒贈韓通敕。今載<span class="shuminghao">宋文鑑</span>中。</span>有所諱而不立傳者。一節偶疎。諸史類然。不足以爲修病也。修之文章。冠冕有宋。此書一筆一削。尤具深心。其有裨於風教者甚大。惟其考證之疎。則有或不盡知者。故具論如右。俾來者有所別白。其註爲徐無黨作。頗爲淺陋。相傳已久。今仍竝錄之焉。<br/>
 </p></div></body>
 </html>