Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Workbook - WorkBook Usage Report missing fields for analytic rules due to using old preview API #9830

Closed
MikeP1375 opened this issue Jan 27, 2024 · 6 comments · Fixed by #10239
Assignees
Labels
Workbook Workbook specialty review needed

Comments

@MikeP1375
Copy link

Describe the bug
The workbook 'Workbook usage report' is using the 2202-06-01-preview api which does not include fields like Description, Severity for the display of analytic rules. The latest API version is 2023-11-01 which includes the fields.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/securityinsights/alert-rules/list?view=rest-securityinsights-2023-11-01&tabs=HTTP#code-try-0

Note - Workbook allows for the export of analytic rules.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to Sentinel.
  2. Install the workbook 'workbook usage report' from the content hub.
  3. Navigate to workbooks, and open 'workbook usage report'.
  4. Select Sentinel workspace.
  5. Select Regular Checks (D/W/M).
  6. Select Weekly for Group: Regular Checks.
  7. Select Rules.
  8. Scroll down to '3a. Active Rules via Rest API'.
  9. See fields Description, Severity are not displayed.

Expected behavior
Display fields Description, Severity. Updating the API version to 2023-11-01 would allow the additional information to be displayed.

Screenshots
image

image

Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting an Issue to the Azure Sentinel GitHub repo! You should expect an initial response to your Issue from the team within 5 business days. Note that this response may be delayed during holiday periods. For urgent, production-affecting issues please raise a support ticket via the Azure Portal.

@v-muuppugund v-muuppugund added the Workbook Workbook specialty review needed label Jan 29, 2024
@v-muuppugund
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MikeP1375 , Thanks for flagging this issue, we will investigate this issue and get back to you with some updates by 02/02/2024. Thanks!

@v-muuppugund
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MikeP1375 ,I am able to replicate the issue and working on further analysis ,will update you.

@v-muuppugund
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MikeP1375 ,need some more time for applying those missing fields,working on it,will update you

@v-muuppugund
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MikeP1375 ,I have modified the api call and added the fields in KQL query,Please find below screen shot for reference,will be raising the PR for the same,
image

@v-muuppugund
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MikeP1375 ,I have modified the api call and added the fields in KQL query,Please find below screen shot for reference,will be raising the PR for the same, image

Hi @MikeP1375 ,Apologies for delayed response, Raised the PR,once merged,will close the issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Workbook Workbook specialty review needed
Projects
None yet
3 participants