-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Spandrel Force Result #457
Add Spandrel Force Result #457
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have not tested, but just as a first comment, please have a look at the changes made by @peterjamesnugent in #455. Think the spandrel forces should follow suit, and also not inherit from BarForce
I have tested the functionality and happy that it works as expected with the test scripts provided. @GCRA101 I will wait until the comments above have been addressed before approving this PR. |
In line with what already done with PierForce
@IsakNaslundBh , @Chrisshort92 , Updated code pushed to origin for your final check. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't get it to build without changes to the SpandrelForce
, also it needs to update from origin/develop.
Co-authored-by: Peter Nugent <Peter.Nugent@burohappold.com>
Co-authored-by: Peter Nugent <Peter.Nugent@burohappold.com>
Co-authored-by: Peter Nugent <Peter.Nugent@burohappold.com>
…ETABS_Toolkit-#430-AddSpandrelForceResult
@peterjamesnugent thanks for your comments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank for the comments.
I've incorporated them in the code and tested it in Grasshopper.
Feature works as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functionality has been tested and approved against the latest changes based on previous conversations about with @IsakNaslundBh and @peterjamesnugent.
Changes have been adopted in commits above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functionality checked and code changes adopted. Approved for merge
@BHoMBot check required |
@Chrisshort92 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance |
@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few more changes need to be made to align it with the other ReadResults. Happy to run it through on a call tomorrow.
Duplication removed.
@peterjamesnugent , @Chrisshort92 I've updated the initialization call of the PierAndSpandrel enum as suggested by Isak in today's call. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some changes from csproj need to be removed.
Otherwise I am happy with the code changes - just @Chrisshort92 to review functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functionality tested with most recent changes. Component working as expected.
@BHoMBot check required |
@peterjamesnugent to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance |
@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check null-handling |
@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@GCRA101 to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
Issues addressed by this PR
Closes #430
Test files
Grasshopper File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23457-AddSpandrelForceResult/Test%20Script.gh?csf=1&web=1&e=caphlX
ETABS File
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:u:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/ETABS_Toolkit/%23457-AddSpandrelForceResult/Test%20ETABS%20Model.EDB?csf=1&web=1&e=6N8BDm
Changelog