Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added simulation properties isDraft and status to search index #5237

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

crisely09
Copy link
Contributor

Properties to be queried for SynaptomeSimulation and SingleNeuronSimulation types.

@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@ CONSTRUCT {
?alias :singleNeuronSimulation ?singleNeuronSimulation .
?singleNeuronSimulation :injectionLocation ?injectionLocation .
?singleNeuronSimulation :recordingLocation ?recordingLocation .
?singleNeuronSimulation :isDraft ?isDraft .
?singleNeuronSimulation :status ?status .
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

status is already used by simulation campaigns, are we sure they are not clashing each other ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are they indexed together? how is the batch constructed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there a way to test this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They can as the batch takes the state log in its chronological order

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

then isn't it the same for Simulation VS SimulationCampaign, they both use status

@crisely09 crisely09 merged commit 566e436 into BlueBrain:master Nov 19, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants