Engagement/jessica/15545 test bank return messages api

[JessicaWNava]

This PR adds an endpoint and tests for it that returns the messages in the test-bank blob

Test Steps:

1. Ensure the tests pass
2. Run locally and ensure when you hit http://localhost:7071/api/reports/testing a message is returned (will need to manually upload one to test-bank as well as create this blob container locally)

Changes

• Added an endpoint and tests for it that returns the messages in the test-bank blob

Checklist

Testing

• Tested locally?
• Ran ./prime test or ./gradlew testSmoke against local Docker ReportStream container?
• (For Changes to /frontend-react/...) Ran npm run lint:write?
• Added tests?

Process

• Are there licensing issues with any new dependencies introduced?
• Includes a summary of what a code reviewer should test/verify?
• Updated the release notes?
• Database changes are submitted as a separate PR?
• DevOps team has been notified if PR requires ops support?

Linked Issues

• Fixes #issue

To Be Done

Create GitHub issues to track the work remaining, if any

• #issue

Specific Security-related subjects a reviewer should pay specific attention to

• Does this PR introduce new endpoints?
  • new endpoint A
  • new endpoint B
• Does this PR include changes in authentication and/or authorization of existing endpoints?
• Does this change introduce new dependencies that need vetting?
• Does this change require changes to our infrastructure?
• Does logging contain sensitive data?
• Does this PR include or remove any sensitive information itself?

If you answered 'yes' to any of the questions above, conduct a detailed Review that addresses at least:

• What are the potential security threats and mitigations? Please list the STRIDE threats and how they are mitigated
  • Spoofing (faking authenticity)
    • Threat T, which could be achieved by A, is mitigated by M
  • Tampering (influence or sabotage the integrity of information, data, or system)
  • Repudiation (the ability to dispute the origin or originator of an action)
  • Information disclosure (data made available to entities who should not have it)
  • Denial of service (make a resource unavailable)
  • Elevation of Privilege (reduce restrictions that apply or gain privileges one should not have)
• Have you ensured logging does not contain sensitive data?
• Have you received any additional approvals needed for this change?

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details

Scanned Manifest Files

[github-actions]

Test Results

1 212 tests  +3   1 208 ✅ +3   6m 21s ⏱️ -14s
  158 suites ±0       4 💤 ±0 
  158 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0b7dd6f. ± Comparison against base commit 11474db.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[github-actions]

Integration Test Results

 63 files  ±0   63 suites  ±0   29m 27s ⏱️ -15s
437 tests ±0  428 ✅ ±0  9 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
440 runs  ±0  431 ✅ ±0  9 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0b7dd6f. ± Comparison against base commit 11474db.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[victor-chaparro]

Looks good! Good job!

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
73.2% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud