-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update documentation Oct 2024 #7178
Open
philknows
wants to merge
12
commits into
unstable
Choose a base branch
from
philknows/docsupdate-oct2024
base: unstable
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fc7242b
docs update oct 2024 init
philknows dae0c96
Reconfig quickstart nav and minor fixes
philknows 42460a3
fix lint
philknows a5b3fe9
spelling fixes
philknows e59a6ec
minor fixes and add to wordlist
philknows affc183
prettier fix
philknows 4ad2127
add to wordlist
philknows 48dbab9
sort wordlist
philknows 1a92441
modify dominance to include lighthouse
philknows ec1de12
fix typescript casing and add recommendation
philknows dcbe8ba
add selection and boost_factor with keymanager notice
philknows 72b5e9a
update wordlist
philknows File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we also add a hardware expectation for running EL+CL like what Nimbus does here?
Broadly, to run both an execution and a consensus client on the same machine, we recommend a 2 TB SSD and 16 GB RAM.
https://nimbus.guide/hardware.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I opted not to only because of the variations of the different EL clients. Will be easier IMO to just have the user figure out their recommendations and add it to our recommendations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure this is even a good recommendation anymore, I generally recommend people to go for 4TB nowadays since it's unknown when we will ship the verge + blob count increase adds further storage burden.
16GB is also bit tight for Lodestar with most other ELs, it's not sufficient with Nethermind for example, my server is sitting at 17.2GB