Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

switch to using NVTX annotate instead of range #2090

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2023
Merged

switch to using NVTX annotate instead of range #2090

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2023

Conversation

simonbyrne
Copy link
Member

@simonbyrne simonbyrne commented Sep 14, 2023

Purpose

Switches to NVTX.@annotate, which applies at the definition, and makes sure we don't miss any precomputed quantities calls.

To-do

Content


  • I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.

@simonbyrne
Copy link
Member Author

A bit clearer what is going on now:
Screenshot 2023-09-14 at 10 00 01 PM

@simonbyrne
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Sep 17, 2023

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot merged commit df65d3b into main Sep 17, 2023
14 of 15 checks passed
@bors bors bot deleted the sb/nvtx-annotate branch September 17, 2023 21:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants