Snow surface temperature parameterization #878
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
Adds the parameterization that @sarahhzhangg developed for snow surface temperature
To-do
This currently gives some poor results - is this due to snow depth being incorrect?
Make this an optional parameterization using Julia structs
Rebase after Andy's snow depth model is merged into main
Address other questions:
Using snow_thermal_conductivity instead of kappa_ice seems to overall worsen the model performance (based on RMSE, although it improved cdp temperature RMSE a bit)
Might be better to use kappa_ice in the rebased version?
The stability issue seems to be gone (runs for snb)
It seems like your rebased version inputs FT(0) instead of h_sfc (line 331)
Does it matter what is used as the initial guess (Tair vs Tbulk) in the root solver?
Is the removal of runoff energy from the fluxes (Fh) intentional?
Content