Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt at multi-bike support #82

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Attempt at multi-bike support #82

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

CoMPaTech
Copy link
Owner

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech commented Feb 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added bike selection during configuration, allowing users to choose their specific bike.
    • Introduced new methods for bike detection and trip data reset.
    • Enhanced API call functionality to fetch full bike data.
  • Updates

    • Updated version to 0.4.0a3 in manifest.
    • Incremented module version to 0.2.0.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved exception handling in data fetching methods.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 4, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

5 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech changed the title Attempt for multi-bike support Attempt at multi-bike support Mar 15, 2024
@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 27, 2024

Actions Performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The update enhances the Stromer integration for Home Assistant by introducing bike selection during configuration and improving data handling. Key modifications include refining the configuration flow, adding constants, and expanding API functionalities to retrieve and reset bike data. The version number increments reflect these improvements, signaling a more robust and user-friendly experience.

Changes

Files Change Summaries
custom_components/stromer/__init__.py Added bike_id, bike_name, and bike_model assignments from entry.data.
custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py Changed validate_input return type; added async_step_bike for bike selection; enhanced async_step_user for multiple bike IDs.
custom_components/stromer/const.py Introduced a new constant BIKE_DETAILS.
custom_components/stromer/manifest.json Updated version from "0.3.3" to "0.4.0a3".
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py Updated version to "0.2.0"; added full_data, improved API handling, and modified connection logic.
pyproject.toml Restructured ruff configurations to improve organization and clarity in linting rules.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant HA_Core as Home Assistant Core
    participant Stromer as Stromer Integration
    participant API as Stromer API

    User ->> HA_Core: Start configuration
    HA_Core ->> Stromer: async_step_user
    Stromer ->> API: Fetch bike data
    API -->> Stromer: Return bike data
    Stromer ->> HA_Core: Prompt bike selection
    User ->> HA_Core: Select bike
    HA_Core ->> Stromer: async_step_bike
    Stromer ->> API: Set unique IDs
    API -->> Stromer: Confirmation
    Stromer ->> HA_Core: Create entry
Loading

Poem

In a burrow deep with code to spin,
A rabbit hops forth, a grin on his chin.
Bikes are chosen with joy and glee,
Data flows smooth, as bright as can be.
Versions ascend like stars in the night,
Home Assistant blooms, all functions in sight.
🌟🚲✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (1)

Line range hint 225-239: The method stromer_call_api is well-implemented for fetching data from the API. Consider using format specifiers for string formatting for consistency and readability.

-        log = "API call status: %s" % res.status
-        log = "API call returns: %s" % ret
+        log = f"API call status: {res.status}"
+        log = f"API call returns: {ret}"
Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ead07af and e348bd8.
Files selected for processing (11)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/init.py (2 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/button.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py (4 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/const.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/strings.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (6 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/translations/en.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/translations/nl.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • custom_components/stromer/const.py
  • custom_components/stromer/manifest.json
  • custom_components/stromer/translations/nl.json
Additional Context Used
Ruff (9)
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (9)

129-129: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling


189-189: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


191-191: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


205-205: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


207-207: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


220-220: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


222-222: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


234-234: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


236-236: Use format specifiers instead of percent format

Additional comments not posted (13)
custom_components/stromer/strings.json (1)

26-30: The addition of the "Reset trip data" button entity is correctly implemented and aligns with the new feature requirements.

custom_components/stromer/translations/en.json (1)

26-30: The English translation for the "Reset trip data" button is correctly implemented.

custom_components/stromer/button.py (4)

4-8: The imports are well-organized and correctly scoped for the functionality required in this file.

Also applies to: 13-15


17-24: The BUTTONS tuple is correctly defined with appropriate attributes for the "Reset trip data" button.


26-37: The async_setup_entry function is properly updated to handle the dynamic addition of button entities based on the bike data.


40-67: The StromerButton class is well-implemented with clear and concise logic for handling button presses and entity setup.

custom_components/stromer/__init__.py (2)

19-19: The addition of Platform.BUTTON to the PLATFORMS list is appropriate for supporting the new button functionality.


39-41: The handling of bike-specific data in the async_setup_entry function is correctly implemented, enhancing the configuration capabilities for individual bikes.

custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py (2)

Line range hint 27-42: The validate_input function is correctly updated to handle bike data validation, crucial for the multi-bike support feature.


50-79: The async_step_bike method is well-implemented, providing a clear and user-friendly flow for bike selection during configuration.

README.md (1)

38-39: The README is updated to include information about the new "Reset trip data" button, providing clear guidance to users on the new feature.

custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (2)

3-3: Updated version number to "0.2.0" aligns with the PR's intent to introduce significant functionality.


39-39: Initialization of full_data, bike_id, bike_name, and bike_model supports the new multi-bike functionality.

custom_components/stromer/stromer.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e348bd8 and f205025.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (6 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Ruff (9)
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (9)

129-129: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling


189-189: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


191-191: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


205-205: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


207-207: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


220-220: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


222-222: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


233-233: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


235-235: Use format specifiers instead of percent format

Additional comments not posted (3)
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (3)

3-3: Updated module version to "0.2.0" aligns with the PR's objective to introduce significant new features.


39-39: Initialization of new attributes for handling bike data is a good practice for managing state within the class.


237-238: The conditional return based on the full flag is a good practice for API data fetching, allowing for flexible data retrieval.

custom_components/stromer/stromer.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
5 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (2)

Line range hint 189-189: Use format specifiers instead of percent format for logging to enhance readability and maintainability.

-        log = "API call lock status: %s" % res.status
-        LOGGER.debug(log)
-        log = "API call lock returns: %s" % ret
-        log = "API call light status: %s" % res.status
-        LOGGER.debug(log)
-        log = "API call light returns: %s" % ret
-        log = "API call status: %s" % res.status
-        LOGGER.debug(log)
-        log = "API call returns: %s" % ret
+        log = f"API call lock status: {res.status}"
+        LOGGER.debug(log)
+        log = f"API call lock returns: {ret}"
+        log = f"API call light status: {res.status}"
+        LOGGER.debug(log)
+        log = f"API call light returns: {ret}"
+        log = f"API call status: {res.status}"
+        LOGGER.debug(log)
+        log = f"API call returns: {ret}"

Also applies to: 191-191, 205-205, 207-207, 231-231, 233-233


[!TIP]
Codebase Verification

The search results show multiple calls to the stromer_call_api method, with some instances handling the full parameter and others not. Here are the relevant lines:

  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py: self.full_data = await self.stromer_call_api(endpoint="bike/", full=True)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py:# self.full_data = await self.stromer_call_api(endpoint="bike/")
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py: self.status = await self.stromer_call_api(endpoint=endpoint)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py: self.position = await self.stromer_call_api(endpoint=endpoint)

The full parameter is explicitly set in the first instance but not in the others. This suggests that the full parameter is not consistently handled across all calls.

  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py: async def stromer_call_api(self, endpoint: str, full=False) -> Any: (method definition)

Action Required:

Ensure that the full parameter is correctly handled in all calls to the stromer_call_api method.

  • File: custom_components/stromer/stromer.py
    • Lines: 232-239 (method definition)
    • Lines: 3 instances of method calls without full parameter
Analysis chain

Line range hint 222-236: The method stromer_call_api has been updated to optionally return full data. Ensure that the full parameter is handled correctly in all calls to this method.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all calls to `stromer_call_api` handle the `full` parameter correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of the `full` parameter.
rg --type python $'stromer_call_api'

Length of output: 66



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all calls to `stromer_call_api` handle the `full` parameter correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper handling of the `full` parameter.
rg --type py 'stromer_call_api'

Length of output: 610

Tools
Ruff

233-233: Use format specifiers instead of percent format

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f205025 and 2b4e76a.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • custom_components/stromer/init.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py (4 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/const.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • custom_components/stromer/init.py
  • custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py
  • custom_components/stromer/const.py
  • custom_components/stromer/manifest.json
Additional context used
Ruff
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py

129-129: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling


189-189: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


191-191: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


205-205: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


207-207: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


231-231: Use format specifiers instead of percent format


233-233: Use format specifiers instead of percent format

Additional comments not posted (3)
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (3)

3-3: Updated version number to "0.2.0" aligns with the significant changes made in this module.


39-39: Initialization of new attributes full_data, bike_id, bike_name, and bike_model supports the enhanced functionality for handling multiple bikes.


55-64: The commented-out code should be removed if it's no longer needed, to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

- #        try:
- #            await self.stromer_update()
- #        except Exception as e:
- #            log = f"Stromer unable to update: {e}"
- #            LOGGER.error(log)
- #        LOGGER.debug("Stromer connected!")
- #        return self.status
- #        return True

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

custom_components/stromer/stromer.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b4e76a and 4f51bff.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • custom_components/stromer/init.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py (4 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/const.py (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/manifest.json (1 hunks)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • custom_components/stromer/const.py
Additional comments not posted (9)
custom_components/stromer/manifest.json (1)

11-11: Version update approved.

The version number has been updated to "0.4.0a3", indicating new features or enhancements under testing.

custom_components/stromer/__init__.py (1)

39-41: LGTM! But verify the usage of new attributes.

The new assignments enrich the stromer instance with additional bike details. Ensure that these new attributes (bike_id, bike_name, bike_model) are used correctly throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

The new attributes are used correctly throughout the codebase.

The attributes bike_id, bike_name, and bike_model are utilized in the following locations:

  • custom_components/stromer/__init__.py
    • Updating configuration entries.
    • Setting up identifiers.
    • Logging data.
  • custom_components/stromer/coordinator.py
    • Logging data.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new attributes in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of new attributes. Expect: Correct usage of `bike_id`, `bike_name`, and `bike_model`.
rg --type python -A 5 $'stromer.bike_id|stromer.bike_name|stromer.bike_model'

Length of output: 109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new attributes in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of new attributes. Expect: Correct usage of `bike_id`, `bike_name`, and `bike_model`.
rg 'stromer.bike_id|stromer.bike_name|stromer.bike_model' -A 5

Length of output: 2405

custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py (3)

50-79: New step async_step_bike approved.

The new step async_step_bike enhances the configuration flow by allowing the selection of multiple bikes. Ensure that this step integrates seamlessly with the rest of the flow.


92-106: Enhancements to async_step_user approved.

The enhancements to async_step_user improve the handling of bike data and streamline the configuration process. Ensure that the new flow is thoroughly tested.


Line range hint 27-42:
LGTM! Verify the correctness of the new return type.

The return type of validate_input has been changed to dict, and it now returns bikes_data. Ensure that this new return type is handled correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

The new return type of validate_input is correctly handled.

The validate_input function's new return type (dict) is used in custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py, where bikes_data is iterated over and processed correctly.

  • custom_components/stromer/config_flow.py: Lines following the call to validate_input correctly handle the dictionary returned by iterating over its items and extracting specific fields.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the new return type in `validate_input`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `validate_input`. Expect: Correct handling of the new return type.
rg --type python -A 5 $'validate_input'

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of the new return type in `validate_input`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `validate_input`. Expect: Correct handling of the new return type.
rg -A 5 'validate_input'

Length of output: 1084

custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (4)

3-3: Version update approved.

The version number update from "0.1.1" to "0.2.0" reflects the new enhancements.


39-39: Addition of full_data attribute approved.

The new attribute full_data will store comprehensive bike data retrieved from the API.


66-76: Changes to stromer_detect method approved.

The updated error handling and retrieval of full data improve the method's clarity and functionality.


Line range hint 222-236:
Changes to stromer_call_api method approved.

The addition of the full parameter enhances the method's flexibility to return either a single bike's data or the complete dataset.

Tools
Ruff

233-233: Use format specifiers instead of percent format

Replace with format specifiers

(UP031)

custom_components/stromer/stromer.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
custom_components/stromer/stromer.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 24, 2024

@CoMPaTech
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f51bff and 1735f80.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py (9 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • custom_components/stromer/stromer.py
Additional comments not posted (7)
pyproject.toml (7)

Line range hint 12-72:
Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the select list enhances clarity and maintainability.


Line range hint 78-98:
Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the ignore list enhances clarity and maintainability.


Line range hint 100-109:
Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the flake8-import-conventions.extend-aliases section enhances clarity and maintainability.


109-112: Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the flake8-pytest-style section enhances clarity and maintainability.


112-115: Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the flake8-tidy-imports.banned-api section enhances clarity and maintainability.


Line range hint 115-133:
Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the isort section enhances clarity and maintainability.


133-135: Structural changes approved.

The addition of the lint. prefix to the mccabe section enhances clarity and maintainability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant