Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replaced disposition of aggregate with inheres in aggregate #279

Conversation

cameronmore
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ cco:disposition_of_aggregate rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:subPropertyOf cco:inheres_in_aggregate ;
rdfs:domain obo:BFO_0000016 ;
rdfs:range obo:BFO_0000027 ;
cco:definition "x disposition_of_aggregate y iff y is an instance of Object Aggregate and x is an instance of Disposition, such that x disposition_of_aggregate y."@en ;
cco:definition "x disposition_of_aggregate y iff y is an instance of Object Aggregate and x is an instance of Disposition, such that x inheres_in_aggregate y."@en ;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cameronmore Please consider changing 'such that' to 'and' throughout this formulations. My read is that the superproperty holds independently of the type instantiation of the relata, but 'such that' implies there is a relationships here.

@neilotte neilotte merged commit d5cd4a0 into CommonCoreOntology:develop Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Problems with definitions for subproperties of inheres in aggregate
2 participants