Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed restrictions on definition of mine #283

Conversation

cameronmore
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cameronmore cameronmore linked an issue Jun 25, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ cco:MilitaryHeadquartersFacility rdf:type owl:Class ;
### http://www.ontologyrepository.com/CommonCoreOntologies/Mine
cco:Mine rdf:type owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf cco:Facility ;
cco:definition "A Facility that is designed to support the extraction of valuable minerals and geological materials from the earth from an orebody, lode, vein, seam, reef, or placer deposits which forms the mineralized package of economic interest to the miner."@en ;
cco:definition "A Facility that is designed to support the extraction of minerals or other geological materials from the earth from an orebody, lode, vein, seam, reef, or placer deposit which forms the mineralized package of interest to the miner."@en ;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cameronmore Please consider simplifying to: "...from an orebody, lode, vein, seam, reef, or placer deposit within the earth."

@neilotte neilotte merged commit d1a11e4 into CommonCoreOntology:develop Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Definition of ‘Mine’ too restrictive?
2 participants