Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

linea_getTransactionExclusionStatusV1 API reference #739

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

linea_getTransactionExclusionStatusV1 API reference #739

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

jlwllmr
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlwllmr jlwllmr commented Sep 16, 2024

Documents the new method for retrieving details of transactions rejected by the sequencer because they exceed the prover's line limit.

@vercel Vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
doc-zk-evm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 19, 2024 3:12pm

@jonesho
Copy link

jonesho commented Sep 16, 2024

@jlwllmr it'd be nice if you could also mention if the given tx hash was not found, the result will be null:

{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 1,
    "result": null
}

m4sterbunny
m4sterbunny requested changes Sep 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@m4sterbunny m4sterbunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Couple of nitpicks, + recommend checking that request b4 publishing

m4sterbunny
m4sterbunny approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@m4sterbunny m4sterbunny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor nitpick else LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@julien-marchand julien-marchand julien-marchand left review comments

@m4sterbunny m4sterbunny m4sterbunny approved these changes

@jonesho jonesho jonesho left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@jlwllmr @jonesho @julien-marchand @m4sterbunny