Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JSONSchema.jl, validate models vs. petrinet schema #106

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2023

Conversation

jClugstor
Copy link
Collaborator

When an operation request is made all models are checked against the petrinet AMR schema. If the model is not valid against the schema, a warning with information about what's wrong is produced.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #106 (b002b25) into main (13e8715) will decrease coverage by 1.13%.
The diff coverage is 53.84%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #106      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.90%   77.77%   -1.13%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         384      396      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits          303      308       +5     
- Misses         81       88       +7     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/SimulationService.jl 70.00% <53.84%> (-1.56%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@joshday joshday merged commit d8cda9c into DARPA-ASKEM:main Aug 15, 2023
2 checks passed
@jClugstor jClugstor deleted the schemachecking branch October 25, 2023 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants