Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fleet] Migrate ddtrace references to telem package #32175

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

raphaelgavache
Copy link
Member

@raphaelgavache raphaelgavache commented Dec 13, 2024

What does this PR do?

ddtrace accounts for 70% of downloader size, and a big chunk of installer too. Preparing the phasing out of the package by moving all references to telemetry package
Follow-up from Arthur's work

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@raphaelgavache raphaelgavache requested review from a team as code owners December 13, 2024 23:22
@github-actions github-actions bot added the long review PR is complex, plan time to review it label Dec 13, 2024
@raphaelgavache raphaelgavache added team/fleet-automation changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Dec 13, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor e87eaecb8358a40207a043f80e85cc173500a992

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1268.87MB 1268.87MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1278.10MB 1278.10MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1278.10MB 1278.10MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 1003.93MB 1003.93MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 1013.15MB 1013.15MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 78.52MB 78.52MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 78.59MB 78.59MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 78.59MB 78.59MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 55.74MB 55.74MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 505.42MB 505.42MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.28MB 113.28MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.35MB 113.35MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.35MB 113.35MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 108.76MB 108.76MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 108.83MB 108.83MB 10.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=51138793 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit a18cf92

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 33d54d94-064d-4570-aee2-75dd67ea3bdd

Baseline: e87eaec
Comparison: a18cf92
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +1.66 [+1.56, +1.76] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.77 [+0.04, +1.51] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.28 [+0.23, +0.33] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.10 [-0.66, +0.87] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.03 [-0.79, +0.84] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.02 [-0.10, +0.14] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput +0.00 [-0.76, +0.77] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.10, +0.10] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.83, +0.82] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.64, +0.62] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.08 [-0.54, +0.39] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.09 [-0.98, +0.81] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.35 [-1.12, +0.41] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.68 [-0.74, -0.62] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -1.52 [-2.17, -0.87] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -1.87 [-4.79, +1.05] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 7/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 8/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog long review PR is complex, plan time to review it qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/fleet-automation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant