Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Datadog SDK to version 2.9.0 #254

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024
Merged

Update Datadog SDK to version 2.9.0 #254

merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

mobile-app-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR has been created automatically by the CI
Updating Datadog SDK from version 2.8.0 to version 2.9.0: diff

@mobile-app-ci mobile-app-ci requested review from a team as code owners May 2, 2024 13:21
@0xnm 0xnm force-pushed the update_sdk_2.9.0 branch from 843d0fa to e8a0109 Compare May 2, 2024 13:41
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.40%. Comparing base (bedd416) to head (e8a0109).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop     #254      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      81.50%   81.40%   -0.10%     
+ Complexity       205      204       -1     
=============================================
  Files             26       26              
  Lines            800      801       +1     
  Branches         104      104              
=============================================
  Hits             652      652              
  Misses           112      112              
- Partials          36       37       +1     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@0xnm 0xnm merged commit b1ee483 into develop May 2, 2024
13 checks passed
@0xnm 0xnm deleted the update_sdk_2.9.0 branch May 2, 2024 15:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants