Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #61 from jdebacker/doc_updates
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Merging
  • Loading branch information
rickecon committed Jul 30, 2024
2 parents 602d724 + 621ebb8 commit 516df70
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 44 changed files with 412 additions and 910 deletions.
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions docs/book/_config.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
####################################################
# Book settings
title : OG-ZAF
author : Marcelo LaFleur and Richard W. Evans
copyright : '2022'
author : Marcelo LaFleur, Richard W. Evans, and Jason DeBacker
copyright : '2024'
logo : '..//OG-ZAF_logo.png'

####################################################
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ sphinx:
config : # key-value pairs to directly over-ride the Sphinx configuration
bibtex_reference_style: author_year
mathjax_path : https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-mml-chtml.js
autodoc_preserve_defaults: True

####################################################
# LaTeX information
Expand Down
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions docs/book/_toc.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,14 +9,15 @@ parts:
- file: content/api/public_api
- caption: Calibration
chapters:
- file: content/calibration/exogenous_parameters
- file: content/calibration/households
- file: content/calibration/firms
- file: content/calibration/macro
- file: content/calibration/demographics
- file: content/calibration/earnings
- file: content/calibration/tax_functions
- file: content/calibration/bequests
- file: content/calibration/taxes
- file: content/calibration/UBI
- file: content/calibration/matching_lwi
- file: content/calibration/exogenous_parameters
- caption: References
chapters:
- file: content/OGZAF_references
Expand Down
207 changes: 0 additions & 207 deletions docs/book/citations.bib
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,207 +0,0 @@
@TECHREPORT{DeBackerEtAl:2017b,
AUTHOR = {Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans and Evan Magnusson and Kerk L. Phillips and Shanthi Ramnath and Isaac Swift},
TITLE = {The Distributional Effects of Redistributional Tax Policy},
INSTITUTION = {Open Source Macroeconomics Laboratory},
YEAR = {2017b},
type = {mimeo},
month = {January},
}

@Article{DEP:2019,
author={Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans and Kerk L. Phillips},
title={{Integrating Microsimulation Models of Tax Policy into a DGE Macroeconomic Model}},
journal={Public Finance Review},
year=2019,
volume={47},
number={2},
pages={207-275},
month={March},
keywords={microsimulation; effective tax rates; marginal tax rates; dynamic general equilibrium; dynamic scori},
doi={},
abstract={This article proposes a method for integrating individual effective tax rates and marginal tax rates computed from a microsimulation (partial equilibrium) model of tax policy with a dynamic general equilibrium model of tax policy that can provide macroeconomic analysis or dynamic scores of tax reforms. Our approach captures the rich heterogeneity, realistic demographics, and tax-code detail of the microsimulation model and allows this detail to inform a general equilibrium model with a relatively high degree of heterogeneity. In addition, we propose a functional form in which tax rates depend jointly on the levels of both capital income and labor income.},
url={https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v47y2019i2p207-275.html}
}

@TECHREPORT{Pomerleau2020b,
AUTHOR = {Kyle Pomerleau},
TITLE = {An analysis of Joe Biden’s tax proposals, October 2020 update},
INSTITUTION = {American Enterprise Institute},
YEAR = {2020},
type = {AEI Report},
month = {October},
url = {https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/an-analysis-of-joe-bidens-tax-proposals-october-2020-update/}
}

@TECHREPORT{DEP2020,
AUTHOR = {Jason DeBacker and Richard Evans and Kyle Pomerleau},
TITLE = {An analysis of Joe Biden’s tax proposals},
INSTITUTION = {American Enterprise Institute},
YEAR = {2020},
type = {AEI Report},
month = {June},
url = {https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/an-analysis-of-joe-bidens-tax-proposals/}
}

@Article{DeBackerFrailey:2019,
author={Jason DeBacker and Anderson Frailey},
title={Revenue and Macroeconomic Effects of a 70% Marginal Tax Rate},
journal={Quantitative Notes},
year=2019,
volume={},
number={2019-1},
pages={},
month={March},
keywords={},
doi={},
abstract={Recently, there has been considerable dis- cussion of a significant increase in the top marginal income tax rate. A salient top marginal tax rate is 70%. This note simulates the effects of a 70% top rate on different groups of filers and shows the im- pacts on revenue and macroeconomic aggregates. We find that an increase in the top marginal tax rate to 70% raises between $5 billion and $250 billion per year over the first 10 years, depending on the size of the top bracket to which this rate is applied. However, our macroeconomic simulations show that a 70% top rate lowers GDP by between 1.7% and 0.1% in the near term, although there may be posi- tive effects on GDP in the longer term.},
url={https://www.openrg.com/reports/70pctMTR_QN.pdf}
}

@Article{Evans:2018,
author={Richard W. Evans},
title={Dynamic Analysis of EITC Expansion},
journal={Quantitative Notes},
year=2018,
volume={},
number={2018-2},
pages={},
month={May},
keywords={},
doi={},
abstract={This Quantitative Note uses the OG-USA open source dynamic general equilibrium overlap- ping generations model to perform a dynamic analy- sis of the Brown-Khanna Grow American Incomes Now (GAIN) Act, which proposes to increase the generosity and scope of the earned income tax credit (EITC) in the United States. I show a simulation of the macroeconomic effects as well as distributional analysis resulting from the GAIN Act. I also sim- ulate the effects of a revenue neutral GAIN Act in which an increase in the marginal income tax rates in the top two personal income brackets exactly off- sets the reduction in total federal tax revenue from the EITC expansion. In the case of the GAIN Act alone, the economy experiences short-run gains, but the increased government debt quickly crowds out in- vestment and causes the economy to start shrinking significantly. In the revenue neutral case, the cost is primarily in terms of large labor supply frictions and a reallocation of the household labor-leisure and consumption-savings decisions.},
url={https://www.openrg.com/reports/QN_EITC_v1.1.pdf}
}

@Article{DeBackerEvans:2018,
author={Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans},
title={Dynamic Analysis of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act},
journal={Quantitative Notes},
year=2018,
volume={},
number={2018-1},
pages={},
month={February},
keywords={},
doi={},
abstract={This Quantitative Note uses the OG-USA open source dynamic general equilibrium overlap- ping generations model to simulate the effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. We simulate this reform under the assumptions of a closed economy and small open economy. In both cases, the TCJA reform causes significant growth in GDP and employment between 1% and 2% per year in the first 8 years. However, the increasing debt-to-GDP ratio quickly crowds out investment and causes a drag on the economy. Wage growth can range from nearly nonexistent to a mod- est 0.6%, depending critically on the assumption of how much capital will flow into the country.},
url={https://www.openrg.com/reports/QN_ogusa_TCJA.pdf}
}

@Article{Evans:2017,
author={Richard W. Evans},
title={Dynamic Analysis of Corporate Income Tax Rate Cut},
journal={Quantitative Notes},
year=2017,
volume={},
number={2017-4},
pages={},
month={November},
keywords={},
doi={},
abstract={This Quantitative Note uses the OG-USA open source dynamic general equilibrium overlap- ping generations model to simulate the effect of cut- ting the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 20%. I simulate this rate cut under the assump- tions of a closed economy and small open economy, respectively. In both cases, the corporate rate cut causes government revenues to decrease and the debt-to-GDP ratio to increase. In the small open economy scenario, GDP and wages increase by around 3.0%, and 2.5%, respectively. However, in the closed economy setting in which the increased debt service must be satisfied by domestic savings (crowding out), the GDP and wage gains are much smaller and short lived.},
url={https://www.openrg.com/reports/QN_CorpCut.pdf}
}

@TECHREPORT{DEP:2015,
AUTHOR = {Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans and Kerk L. Phillips},
TITLE = {Macroeconomic effects of a 10% cut in statutory marginal income tax rates on ordinary income},
INSTITUTION = {American Enterprise Institute},
YEAR = {2015},
type = {AEI Economic Policy Working Paper Series},
month = {December},
}

@Article{Ferenstein:2018,
author={Gregory Ferenstein},
title={Can The U.S. Afford A Massive Wage Subsidy? A Macroeconomic Simulation},
journal={Forbes},
year=2018,
volume={},
number={},
pages={},
month={September},
keywords={},
doi={},
abstract={},
url={https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregoryferenstein/2018/09/30/can-the-us-afford-a-massive-wage-subsidy-a-macroeconomic-simulation/#614ea9032502}
}

@TECHREPORT{MichelFurth:2017b,
AUTHOR = {Adam Michel and Salim Furth},
TITLE = {For Pro-Growth Tax Reform, Expensing Should Be the Focus},
INSTITUTION = {The Heritage Foundation},
YEAR = {2017},
type = {Taxes Report},
month = {August},
url = {https://www.heritage.org/taxes/report/pro-growth-tax-reform-expensing-should-be-the-focus}
}

@TECHREPORT{MichelFurth:2017a,
AUTHOR = {Norbert Michel and Salim Furth},
TITLE = {The Macroeconomic Impact of Dodd Frank—and of Its Repeal},
INSTITUTION = {The Heritage Foundation},
YEAR = {2017},
type = {Taxes Report},
month = {April},
url = {https://www.heritage.org/markets-and-finance/report/the-macroeconomic-impact-dodd-frank-and-its-repeal}
}

@TECHREPORT{Hassett:2015,
AUTHOR = {Kevin A. Hassett},
TITLE = {On the Dynamic Scoring of Fiscal Policy},
INSTITUTION = {},
YEAR = {2015},
type = {Congressional Testimony},
month = {July},
url = {https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Hassett_DynamicScoring_final-00000002.pdf}
}

@TECHREPORT{Hassett:2016,
AUTHOR = {Kevin A. Hassett},
TITLE = {Statement before the House Ways and Means Committee: Reaching America’s Potential: Delivering Growth and Opportunity for All Americans},
INSTITUTION = {},
YEAR = {2016},
type = {Congressional Testimony},
month = {February},
url = {https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/KHtestimony.pdf}
}

@TECHREPORT{DEP:2021a,
AUTHOR = {Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans and Benjamin R. Page},
TITLE = {A Detailed Macroeconomic Analysis of President Biden's 2020 Campaign Tax Proposals},
INSTITUTION = {Tax Policy Center},
YEAR = {2021},
type = {Working Paper},
month = {July},
url = {https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/detailed-macroeconomic-analysis-president-bidens-2020-campaign-tax-proposals}
}

@TECHREPORT{DEP:2021b,
AUTHOR = {Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans and Benjamin R. Page},
TITLE = {A Sensitivity Analysis of a Detailed Macroeconomic Analysis of President Biden's 2020 Campaign Tax Proposals},
INSTITUTION = {Tax Policy Center},
YEAR = {2021},
type = {Working Paper},
month = {July},
url = {https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/sensitivity-analysis-detailed-macroeconomic-analysis-president-bidens-2020-campaign-tax}
}

@TECHREPORT{DEP:2021c,
AUTHOR = {Benjamin R. Page and Jeffrey Rohaly and Thornton Matheson and Gordon B. Mermin and Jason DeBacker and Richard W. Evans},
TITLE = {Macroeconomic Analysis of Former Vice President Biden's Tax Proposals},
INSTITUTION = {Tax Policy Center},
YEAR = {2021},
type = {Brief},
month = {July},
url = {https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/macroeconomic-analysis-former-vice-president-bidens-tax-proposals}
}

@TECHREPORT{Page:2021,
AUTHOR = {Benjamin R. Page},
TITLE = {TPC Experiments with Another Model to Estimate the Economic Effects of Tax Law Changes},
INSTITUTION = {Tax Policy Center},
YEAR = {2021},
type = {TaxVox: Campaigns, Proposals, and Reforms},
month = {July},
url = {https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/tpc-experiments-another-model-estimate-economic-effects-tax-law-changes}
}
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/book/content/api/calibrate.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ ogzaf.calibrate
.. currentmodule:: ogzaf.calibrate

.. autoclass:: Calibration
:members: get_tax_function_parameters, read_tax_func_estimate, get_dict
:members: get_dict
15 changes: 0 additions & 15 deletions docs/book/content/api/demographics.rst

This file was deleted.

13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions docs/book/content/api/income.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
.. _income:

Life-cycle productivity profiles
====================================

**income.py modules**

ogzaf.income
------------------------------------------

.. automodule:: ogzaf.income
:members: arctan_func, arctan_deriv_func, arc_error,
arctan_fit, get_e_interp, get_e_orig
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions docs/book/content/api/input_output.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
.. _input_output:

Output-Consumption Bridge
====================================

**input_output.py modules**

ogzaf.input_output
------------------------------------------

.. automodule:: ogzaf.input_output
:members: get_alpha_c, get_io_matrix
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion docs/book/content/api/public_api.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,5 +12,7 @@ There is also a link to the source code for each documented member.
:maxdepth: 1

calibrate
demographics
income
input_output
macro_params
utils
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions docs/book/content/api/utils.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
.. _utils:

Calibration Utilities
====================================

**utils.py modules**

ogzaf.utils
------------------------------------------

.. currentmodule:: ogzaf.utils

.. autoclass:: CustomHttpAdapter
:members: init_poolmanager

.. automodule:: ogzaf.utils
:members: get_legacy_session
8 changes: 0 additions & 8 deletions docs/book/content/calibration/bequests.md

This file was deleted.

Loading

0 comments on commit 516df70

Please sign in to comment.