Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use same MLMG parameters in MS solver as in ES solver #5517

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

roelof-groenewald
Copy link
Member

@roelof-groenewald roelof-groenewald commented Dec 17, 2024

Fixes #5508.

We might not want to set the solver precision with the same values as used for the ES solver but that can be debated in this PR.

Note this is a patch fix until we can refactor the MS solver to separate it from the WarpX class.

Signed-off-by: roelof-groenewald <regroenewald@gmail.com>
@roelof-groenewald roelof-groenewald added the component: magnetostatic magneticstatic solver label Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: magnetostatic magneticstatic solver
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Setting maximum_iterations in the electrostatic solver does not carry over to the magnetostatic solver
1 participant