Skip to content

EdwardRaff/pyLZJD

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

50 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

pyLZJD

pyLZJD is a Python implementation of the Lempel-Ziv Jaccard Distance, a distance metric designed for arbitrary byte sequences, and originally used for malware classification. It was inspired by and developed as an alternative to the Normalized Compression Distance. But, we've also found it useful for similarity digest taks, where one would normaly use either ssdeep or sdhash.

Why use pyLZJD?

If you need to find similar byte sequences, and your byte sequences can be long (>500kb), then you should consider using LZJD and this implementation! LZJD is fast, efficient, and we've found it to be more accurate than the previously existing options. If you want to know more nity gritty details, check out the two papers listed under citations.

We currently recommend the pyLZJD implementation for ptototyipng and learning / experimenting with the LZJD algorithm. This code is not yet production ready, and better and faster implementations exist.

Why not use pyLZJD?

There currently exists the original Java implementation and a C++ implementation of the LZJD algorithm. While we have implemented the main portion in Cython, this version is currently 3-20 times slower than these more optimized implementations. If you need efficiency or plan to report timing numbers, please do not use this version.

Insallation

To install pyLZJD, you can currently use this syntax with pip:

pip install git+git://github.com/EdwardRaff/pyLZJD#egg=pyLZJD

Or, you can download the repo and run

python setup.py install

Citations

If you use LZJD, please cite it! There are currently two papers related to LZJD. The original paper that introduces it, and a followup paper that shows how LZJD can be used inplace of ssdeep and sdhash, and makes LZJD even faster. Please cite the first paper if you use LZJD at all, and please cite the second as well if you use this implementation as it uses the faster version introduced in the second paper.

@inproceedings{raff_lzjd_2017,
 author = {Raff, Edward and Nicholas, Charles},
 title = {An Alternative to NCD for Large Sequences, Lempel-Ziv Jaccard Distance},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining},
 series = {KDD '17},
 year = {2017},
 isbn = {978-1-4503-4887-4},
 location = {Halifax, NS, Canada},
 pages = {1007--1015},
 numpages = {9},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3097983.3098111},
 doi = {10.1145/3097983.3098111},
 acmid = {3098111},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {cyber security, jaccard similarity, lempel-ziv, malware classification, normalized compression distance},
}

@article{raff_lzjd_digest,
author = {Raff, Edward and Nicholas, Charles K.},
doi = {10.1016/j.diin.2017.12.004},
issn = {17422876},
journal = {Digital Investigation},
month = {feb},
title = {{Lempel-Ziv Jaccard Distance, an effective alternative to ssdeep and sdhash}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2017.12.004},
year = {2018}
}

About

Python implementation of the LZJD algorithm

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 4

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages