Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bazel Cache #1787

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 9, 2024
Merged

Bazel Cache #1787

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

tgymnich
Copy link
Member

@tgymnich tgymnich commented Mar 9, 2024

No description provided.

@tgymnich tgymnich self-assigned this Mar 9, 2024
@tgymnich tgymnich marked this pull request as ready for review March 9, 2024 14:36
@wsmoses
Copy link
Member

wsmoses commented Mar 9, 2024

So the bazel builds are always the latest llvm commit so I'm not sure how much the gain of caching will be vs the cache size

@tgymnich
Copy link
Member Author

tgymnich commented Mar 9, 2024

We still get the benefits of incremental builds of both Enzyme and LLVM.

2m 29s vs. 2h 13m 45s

seems worth it to me.

@tgymnich tgymnich enabled auto-merge March 9, 2024 20:41
@wsmoses
Copy link
Member

wsmoses commented Mar 9, 2024

Oh that's very substantial then, definitely should merge.

@tgymnich tgymnich added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 9, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 73d862a Mar 9, 2024
46 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants