Live, public instance (running on OpenShift): https://jiralist-apilord.rhcloud.com
JBoss JIRA is great and we want to make sure we capture all of our work as JIRA issues, but it can be quite slow, especially when trying to break down project work into fine grained tasks. How can we use something like Wunderlist, but still have the tasks end up in JIRA?
It's basically a way to do most of what I need to do in JIRA, but do it in a faster and more streamlined way. It's an angularjs app that uses the JIRA API to provide a Wunderlist style interface on top of JIRA. You basically create "lists" in the interface, where each list consists of:
- List Name
- JIRA Project
- Version
From this you get a list of JIRA issues for that version. The following actions are supported per item in the list:
- Start Progress
- Stop Progress
- Mark as Done
You can also create new issues.
All of these actions happen quickly, because the UI doesn't wait for the API call to complete. It just assumes everything will work out OK, so it lets you go about your business immediately. All the JIRA API calls happen in the background. The result is a UI that is very responsive, even when JIRA is not.
No information is stored on the server. The configuration of your lists is stored in HTML5 local storage. So even though it's asking for your username/password (so it can make authenticated REST calls to JIRA) that info gets stored in your browser. If you're not comfortable with that, I understand.
Because JIRA's CORS support does not work with BASIC auth (they don't allow the Authorization header) we can't make authenticated calls directly to JIRA. So JIRA-List also includes a CORS proxy. So all JIRA REST API calls are actually going through the JIRA-List proxy...again without storing anything. If you use https this should be reasonably secure, but again you should be aware of what is happening.
I originally created this tool just for the apiman team, but was encouraged to share it more broadly in case others found it useful. This means that you should expect a lot of rough edges, as it wasn't intended to be bullet proof. Error handling is terrible, for example. The feature-set may be pretty specific to our needs and not yours. But I'd be happy to have feedback and/or contributions.