Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump version to 2.8.1 #462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

chore: bump version to 2.8.1 #462

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

EvanNotFound
Copy link
Owner

@EvanNotFound EvanNotFound commented Nov 20, 2024

  • Update version number in package.json from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1
  • Update version number in package-lock.json from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version number of the project from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1 in the package configuration.

- Update version number in package.json from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1
- Update version number in package-lock.json from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the package.json file for the hexo-theme-redefine project, specifically incrementing the version number from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1. No other modifications to the file's structure, dependencies, scripts, or metadata were made.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated version from 2.8.0 to 2.8.1

Possibly related PRs

  • v2.7.1 #430: The changes in this PR involve updating the version number in package.json from "2.7.0" to "2.7.1," which is directly related to the version increment in the main PR.
  • v2.7.3 #448: This PR updates the version number in package.json from "2.7.2" to "2.7.3," showing a similar pattern of version updates as seen in the main PR.
  • v2.8.1 #461: The version number in package.json is updated from "2.8.0" to "2.8.1," which matches the version increment in the main PR.

Suggested labels

deployed

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@EvanNotFound has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 22 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 24a9fb0 and deb0358.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@EvanNotFound EvanNotFound merged commit eaf1829 into main Nov 20, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant