Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add thermodynamic sea ice code #266

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add thermodynamic sea ice code #266

wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

ntlewis
Copy link
Contributor

@ntlewis ntlewis commented May 31, 2024

Adds thermodynamic sea ice code following Zhang et al. (2022).

Test case can be found here: exp/test_cases/thermodynamic_sea_ice/grey_thermo_ice_test_case.py

@ntlewis
thermodynamic sea ice
801352f
@ntlewis
options for single precision (won't work with socrates)
3f76abb
@ntlewis
changes to rrtm to have more control over coszen, and to allow for si…
420d998 
…ngle precision
@ntlewis
let my25 read restart so it actually works
12d0bae
@ntlewis
additions to two_stream_gray for tidally locked planets
8021f3d
@ntlewis
add additional dry convection scheme (+ other changes?)
92f222d
@ntlewis
change valid range for wind for exoplanets
f25a3f1
@ntlewis
add path to new dry convection scheme
990e907
@ntlewis
add nudging options to sea ice code
abc8241
@ntlewis
compiler options in python interface
3cbfbdc
@ntlewis
stuff to do with ozone in grey model
272d573
@ntlewis
remove modifications that only nudge ice for thickness greater than 0.1
e218620
@ntlewis
tidy sea ice branch, so only code necessary for thermodynamic sea ice…
2630ea6 
… is included
@ntlewis
thermodynamic sea ice test case
cbdc1c9
@ntlewis
merge master into thermo sea ice branch
90f3acb
@ntlewis ntlewis requested review from sit23 and daw538 May 31, 2024 12:36
@ntlewis
Copy link
Contributor Author

ntlewis commented May 31, 2024

@sit23 @daw538 Would it be possible for one of you guys to take a look at this at some point? Thanks :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sit23 sit23 Awaiting requested review from sit23

@daw538 daw538 Awaiting requested review from daw538

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
1 participant
@ntlewis