Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Actions Migration #3977

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Actions Migration #3977

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

AmanPrasad43
Copy link
Contributor

@AmanPrasad43 AmanPrasad43 commented Oct 28, 2024

Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • PR description and commit message should describe the changes done in this PR
  • Verify the PR is pointing to correct branch i.e. Release or Beta branch if the code fix is for specific release , else point it to master
  • Latest Code from master or specific release branch is merged to your branch
  • No unwanted\commented\junk code is included
  • No new warning upon build solution
  • Code Summary\Comments are added to my code which explains what my code is doing
  • Existing unit test cases are passed
  • New Unit tests are added for your development
  • Sanity Tests are successfully executed for New and Existing Functionality
  • Verify that changes are compatible with all relevant browsers and platforms.
  • After creating pull request there should not be any conflicts
  • Resolve all Codacy comments
  • Builds and checks are passed before PR is sent for review
  • Resolve code review comments
  • Update the Help Library document to match any feature changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced functionality for sending keystrokes to specific windows.
    • Added new capabilities for creating PDF charts.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Minor formatting adjustments made to improve code readability.
  • Chores

    • Removed several obsolete actions and resources to streamline project structure.
    • Updated project references and package dependencies for improved functionality.
    • Removed the animations functionality to focus on core features.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2024

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 684631c and 2698ceb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj (2 hunks)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (2 hunks)
_________________________________________
< Never ask an AI its Energy Star rating. >
-----------------------------------------
 \
  \   (\__/)
      (•ㅅ•)
      /   づ

Walkthrough

This pull request includes modifications to several files, primarily focusing on restructuring and cleanup within the project. The ActSendKeys class has minor formatting changes, while the Animations.cs file has been deleted, removing its associated animation functionalities. The project files for GingerCore and GingerCoreNET have undergone significant updates, including the addition and removal of various compile items and package references, indicating a reorganization of resources and dependencies.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Ginger/GingerCore/Actions/ActSendKeys.cs Minor formatting changes; no functional alterations.
Ginger/GingerCore/Animations/Animations.cs File deleted; removed animation functionalities for window properties.
Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj Added ActCreatePDFChart.cs and ActSendKeys.cs; removed multiple compile items and directories.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj Added new package references (System.Speech, Tabula, Tesseract, Freeware.Pdf2Png); removed several items.

Suggested reviewers

  • Maheshkale447

🐇 In gardens green, where bunnies play,
New changes bloom, brightening the day.
With keys that send and charts that gleam,
Our code hops forward, a joyous dream!
Restructured paths, like trails in the grass,
We celebrate progress, let the good times amass! 🌼

Tip

CodeRabbit can generate a title for your PR based on the changes.

Add @coderabbitai title placeholder anywhere in the title of your PR and CodeRabbit will replace it with a title based on the changes in the PR. You can change the placeholder by changing the reviews.auto_title_placeholder setting.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51f9232 and d3eabe8.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • Ginger/GingerCore/Actions/ActSendKeys.cs (2 hunks)
  • Ginger/GingerCore/Animations/Animations.cs (0 hunks)
  • Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj (2 hunks)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • Ginger/GingerCore/Animations/Animations.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Ginger/GingerCore/Actions/ActSendKeys.cs
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (1)

236-244: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider updating package versions for security and features.

The newly added packages have potential version concerns:

  • Tabula 0.1.2 is outdated (last updated in 2018)
  • Tesseract 4.1.1 has a newer major version available (5.x)

Consider upgrading to:

-<PackageReference Include="Tabula">
-  <Version>0.1.2</Version>
-</PackageReference>
+<PackageReference Include="Tabula" Version="0.1.3" />

-<PackageReference Include="Tesseract">
-  <Version>4.1.1</Version>
-</PackageReference>
+<PackageReference Include="Tesseract" Version="5.2.0" />
Ginger/GingerCore/GingerCore.csproj (2)

197-198: Confirm the addition of new compile items

The following files have been added to the project:

  • Actions\ActCreatePDFChart.cs
  • Actions\ActSendKeys.cs

Please ensure that:

  • These files exist at the specified paths and are correctly included in the project.
  • The implementations are complete and adhere to the project's coding standards.
  • Any dependencies or resources required by these files are properly configured.

43-52: Verify the removal of embedded resources and None items

The removal of embedded resources and None items for the directories:

  • Actions\REST\**
  • Actions\WebServices\**
  • Environments\**
  • Plugins\**

Please ensure that:

  • All references to these directories and their contents have been removed or updated in the codebase.
  • No functionalities depend on the resources within these directories, to prevent any runtime errors or missing resource issues.

To confirm that there are no remaining references to the removed directories, run the following script:

Comment on lines 403 to 408
<Reference Include="Open3270">
<HintPath>..\Ginger\DLLs\Open3270.dll</HintPath>
</Reference>
<Reference Include="PresentationCore">
<HintPath>..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\.NETFramework\v4.8\PresentationCore.dll</HintPath>
</Reference>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve framework reference configuration for better portability.

The current framework references have several issues:

  1. Absolute paths to framework assemblies make the project less portable
  2. Windows-specific dependencies (PresentationCore, System.Speech, System.Windows.Forms) may impact cross-platform compatibility

Replace absolute paths with SDK references:

-<Reference Include="PresentationCore">
-  <HintPath>..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\.NETFramework\v4.8\PresentationCore.dll</HintPath>
-</Reference>
+<FrameworkReference Include="Microsoft.WindowsDesktop.App" />

-<Reference Include="System.Speech">
-  <HintPath>..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\.NETFramework\v4.8\System.Speech.dll</HintPath>
-</Reference>
-<Reference Include="System.Windows.Forms">
-  <HintPath>..\..\..\..\..\..\..\..\Program Files (x86)\Reference Assemblies\Microsoft\Framework\.NETFramework\v4.8\System.Windows.Forms.dll</HintPath>
-</Reference>

Consider:

  1. Extracting Windows-specific functionality into a separate assembly
  2. Using platform-agnostic alternatives where possible
  3. Implementing proper platform checks for Windows-specific features

Also applies to: 424-429

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3eabe8 and 684631c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/GingerCoreNET.csproj (1)

404-406: Verify Open3270.dll availability and consider NuGet package.

The Open3270.dll is referenced from a relative path. Consider:

  1. Using the NuGet package if available
  2. Including the DLL in source control if it's a custom build
  3. Documenting the source and version of this dependency
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the Open3270 dependency to make a more informed decision.


Let me try one more search to check for any NuGet references with corrected syntax.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Open3270.dll reference is valid but needs documentation

The DLL exists at the specified path and is actively used across multiple mainframe-related components in the codebase. While the relative path reference is correct:

  • The DLL is present in source control at Ginger/Ginger/DLLs/Open3270.dll
  • It's referenced by multiple projects: GingerCoreNET, GingerCore, and Ginger
  • It's used in mainframe automation features (drivers, UI helpers, and actions)

However, there's no documentation about its version, source, or licensing. Consider adding this information to the repository's documentation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if Open3270.dll exists at the specified path
fd -p "Ginger/DLLs/Open3270.dll$"

# Search for any documentation about Open3270
rg -i "open3270" "README.md" || true

Length of output: 101


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if Open3270 is used in the codebase
rg -l "Open3270" --type cs

# Check if there's any NuGet configuration mentioning Open3270
fd "packages.config|*.nuspec|*.csproj" -x rg -l "Open3270" {}

# Check if there's any documentation about the DLL's source or version
fd "CHANGELOG|HISTORY|LICENSE|README" -i -x rg -l "Open3270" {}

# Check the DLL's timestamp and version info
ls -l "Ginger/Ginger/DLLs/Open3270.dll"

Length of output: 1090


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check NuGet configurations with correct glob pattern
fd -e config -e nuspec -e csproj -x rg -l "Open3270" {}

# Check if there's any version information in the source files
rg "Open3270.*Version|Open3270.*[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" --type cs

Length of output: 237

Comment on lines +236 to +245
<PackageReference Include="System.Speech" Version="8.0.0" />
<PackageReference Include="Tabula">
<Version>0.1.2</Version>
</PackageReference>
<PackageReference Include="Tesseract">
<Version>4.1.1</Version>
</PackageReference>
<PackageReference Include="Freeware.Pdf2Png">
<Version>1.0.1</Version>
</PackageReference>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider cross-platform compatibility and standardize package version format.

  1. System.Speech is Windows-specific and may impact cross-platform compatibility. Consider using a cross-platform alternative like Microsoft.CognitiveServices.Speech.
  2. Package version formats are inconsistent:

Apply this diff to standardize version format:

-  <PackageReference Include="System.Speech" Version="8.0.0" />
-  <PackageReference Include="Tabula">
-    <Version>0.1.2</Version>
-  </PackageReference>
+  <PackageReference Include="Tabula" Version="0.1.2" />

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

@Maheshkale447
Copy link
Contributor

Handled it via different PR

@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 deleted the Enhancement/ActionsMigration branch November 18, 2024 09:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants