Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error Handler Report #3998

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

AmanPrasad43
Copy link
Contributor

@AmanPrasad43 AmanPrasad43 commented Nov 14, 2024

Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:

  • PR description and commit message should describe the changes done in this PR
  • Verify the PR is pointing to correct branch i.e. Release or Beta branch if the code fix is for specific release , else point it to master
  • Latest Code from master or specific release branch is merged to your branch
  • No unwanted\commented\junk code is included
  • No new warning upon build solution
  • Code Summary\Comments are added to my code which explains what my code is doing
  • Existing unit test cases are passed
  • New Unit tests are added for your development
  • Sanity Tests are successfully executed for New and Existing Functionality
  • Verify that changes are compatible with all relevant browsers and platforms.
  • After creating pull request there should not be any conflicts
  • Resolve all Codacy comments
  • Builds and checks are passed before PR is sent for review
  • Resolve code review comments
  • Update the Help Library document to match any feature changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new property IsAddedToReport in the ErrorHandler class to track error reporting status.
    • Added a method to enhance error handling by notifying error handlers when associated activities fail.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling mechanism to ensure timely notifications for error handlers.
  • Style

    • Minor formatting changes and comments added for clarity.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new boolean property IsAddedToReport to the ErrorHandler class in the GingerCore namespace, initialized to false. Additionally, a new private method CalculateErrorHandlersActivtyEnd is added to the GingerExecutionEngine class, which enhances error handling by notifying error handlers when their associated activities fail. Minor formatting adjustments have also been made in both files, but no existing functionality or logic has been altered.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/BusinessFlowLib/ErrorHandler.cs Added property: public bool IsAddedToReport { get; set; } = false; with minor formatting changes.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs Added method: private void CalculateErrorHandlersActivtyEnd(Activity activity) with minor formatting changes.

Possibly related PRs

  • cleanup and error handler activity #3975: This PR modifies the GingerExecutionEngine class, which is directly related to the ErrorHandler class in the main PR, as both involve changes to error handling and execution logic.
  • Account Report CleanUp Activity fix #3996: This PR also updates the GingerExecutionEngine class, enhancing error handling and flow control, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding the ErrorHandler class.

Suggested reviewers

  • Maheshkale447

Poem

In the code where errors dwell,
A new flag rings a cheerful bell.
With handlers ready, swift and bright,
They’ll catch the falls, bring wrongs to right.
So hop along, dear code, take flight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/BusinessFlowLib/ErrorHandler.cs (1)

Line range hint 26-26: Consider addressing or clarifying the TODO comment

The TODO comment "change add core" lacks context and clarity. If this is still relevant, it should be clarified or addressed. If not, it should be removed to prevent technical debt.

Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this technical debt item?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 570e01d and ba950d6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/BusinessFlowLib/ErrorHandler.cs (2 hunks)
  • Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/BusinessFlowLib/ErrorHandler.cs (1)

72-72: Verify thread-safety considerations

The IsAddedToReport flag maintains state that could be accessed from multiple threads during error handling. Consider:

  1. Potential race conditions if multiple threads process errors simultaneously
  2. When/how this flag gets reset
  3. Impact on parallel execution of activities

Let's verify the usage pattern:

Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs (1)

4000-4000: Integration point looks correct

The call to CalculateErrorHandlersActivtyEnd is placed appropriately in the RunActivity method after activity execution is complete.

@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ public class ErrorHandler : Activity, IErrorHandler
{
private eHandlerType mHandlerType;
public bool IsSelected { get; set; }
public bool IsAddedToReport { get; set; } = false;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider following existing property patterns and adding documentation

The new IsAddedToReport property deviates from the established patterns in the class:

  1. Missing the [IsSerializedForLocalRepository] attribute that other properties have
  2. No XML documentation explaining its purpose
  3. Different implementation pattern compared to other properties (auto-property vs. backing field)

Consider applying this refactor to maintain consistency:

+        private bool mIsAddedToReport;
+        /// <summary>
+        /// Indicates whether this error handler has been added to the report
+        /// </summary>
+        [IsSerializedForLocalRepository]
+        public bool IsAddedToReport
+        {
+            get { return mIsAddedToReport; }
+            set { if (mIsAddedToReport != value) { mIsAddedToReport = value; OnPropertyChanged(nameof(IsAddedToReport)); } }
+        }
-        public bool IsAddedToReport { get; set; } = false;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public bool IsAddedToReport { get; set; } = false;
private bool mIsAddedToReport;
/// <summary>
/// Indicates whether this error handler has been added to the report
/// </summary>
[IsSerializedForLocalRepository]
public bool IsAddedToReport
{
get { return mIsAddedToReport; }
set { if (mIsAddedToReport != value) { mIsAddedToReport = value; OnPropertyChanged(nameof(IsAddedToReport)); } }
}

Comment on lines +5866 to +5885

private void CalculateErrorHandlersActivtyEnd(Activity activity)
{

var errorHandlerList = CurrentBusinessFlow.Activities.Where(x => x.GetType() == typeof(ErrorHandler) && x.Status != eRunStatus.Skipped);

foreach (ErrorHandler errActivity in errorHandlerList)
{
if ( activity.EndTimeStamp > errActivity.EndTimeStamp && activity.Status == eRunStatus.Failed && !errActivity.IsAddedToReport)
{
uint evetTime = RunListenerBase.GetEventTime();
foreach (RunListenerBase runnerListener in mRunListeners)
{
runnerListener.ActivityEnd(evetTime, errActivity);
}
errActivity.IsAddedToReport = true;
}
}

}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review error handler activity end time calculation logic

The new method has some potential issues:

  1. The LINQ query to filter error handlers could be optimized by combining conditions
  2. The timestamp comparison lacks null checks which could cause NullReferenceException
  3. The method name has a typo ("Activty" instead of "Activity")
  4. The code formatting is inconsistent with extra blank lines

Here's a suggested refactor to address these issues:

-private void CalculateErrorHandlersActivtyEnd(Activity activity)
+private void CalculateErrorHandlerActivityEnd(Activity activity) 
 {
-    var errorHandlerList = CurrentBusinessFlow.Activities.Where(x => x.GetType() == typeof(ErrorHandler) && x.Status != eRunStatus.Skipped);
+    if (activity?.EndTimeStamp == null || activity.Status != eRunStatus.Failed)
+    {
+        return;
+    }

+    var errorHandlerList = CurrentBusinessFlow.Activities
+        .OfType<ErrorHandler>()
+        .Where(x => x.Status != eRunStatus.Skipped && 
+                    x.EndTimeStamp != null && 
+                    !x.IsAddedToReport);

-    foreach (ErrorHandler errActivity in errorHandlerList)
-    {
-        if ( activity.EndTimeStamp > errActivity.EndTimeStamp && activity.Status == eRunStatus.Failed && !errActivity.IsAddedToReport)
-        {
-            uint evetTime = RunListenerBase.GetEventTime();
-            foreach (RunListenerBase runnerListener in mRunListeners)
-            {
-                runnerListener.ActivityEnd(evetTime, errActivity);
-            }
-            errActivity.IsAddedToReport = true;
-        }
-    }
+    foreach (ErrorHandler errHandler in errorHandlerList)
+    {
+        if (activity.EndTimeStamp > errHandler.EndTimeStamp)
+        {
+            uint eventTime = RunListenerBase.GetEventTime();
+            foreach (RunListenerBase runnerListener in mRunListeners)
+            {
+                runnerListener.ActivityEnd(eventTime, errHandler);
+            }
+            errHandler.IsAddedToReport = true;
+        }
+    }
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
private void CalculateErrorHandlersActivtyEnd(Activity activity)
{
var errorHandlerList = CurrentBusinessFlow.Activities.Where(x => x.GetType() == typeof(ErrorHandler) && x.Status != eRunStatus.Skipped);
foreach (ErrorHandler errActivity in errorHandlerList)
{
if ( activity.EndTimeStamp > errActivity.EndTimeStamp && activity.Status == eRunStatus.Failed && !errActivity.IsAddedToReport)
{
uint evetTime = RunListenerBase.GetEventTime();
foreach (RunListenerBase runnerListener in mRunListeners)
{
runnerListener.ActivityEnd(evetTime, errActivity);
}
errActivity.IsAddedToReport = true;
}
}
}
private void CalculateErrorHandlerActivityEnd(Activity activity)
{
if (activity?.EndTimeStamp == null || activity.Status != eRunStatus.Failed)
{
return;
}
var errorHandlerList = CurrentBusinessFlow.Activities
.OfType<ErrorHandler>()
.Where(x => x.Status != eRunStatus.Skipped &&
x.EndTimeStamp != null &&
!x.IsAddedToReport);
foreach (ErrorHandler errHandler in errorHandlerList)
{
if (activity.EndTimeStamp > errHandler.EndTimeStamp)
{
uint eventTime = RunListenerBase.GetEventTime();
foreach (RunListenerBase runnerListener in mRunListeners)
{
runnerListener.ActivityEnd(eventTime, errHandler);
}
errHandler.IsAddedToReport = true;
}
}
}

@Maheshkale447 Maheshkale447 changed the base branch from Releases/Beta to master November 19, 2024 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants