Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse remote reindex task response failures #20095

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

todvora
Copy link
Contributor

@todvora todvora commented Aug 6, 2024

There is yet another data structure in the opensearch task response that can hold errors. We need to be able to parse this structure and aggregate it.

image

/nocl

Description

Errors in this part of the response contain runtime problems during the index migration task. For example if the target index disappears during migration (deleted by our retention strategy).

How Has This Been Tested?

Manually + unit test for parsing

Screenshots (if appropriate):

image

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.

@todvora todvora changed the title Add support for parsing remote reindex task response failures Parse remote reindex task response failures Aug 7, 2024
@todvora todvora marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2024 08:58
.map(RemoteReindexMigration::indexProgress)
.reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);

return sum.divide(BigDecimal.valueOf(indices.size()), 4, RoundingMode.HALF_UP).scaleByPowerOfTen(2).intValue();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could this lead to a wrong result since i.progress() == null is filtered out above and included here by simply using size()?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, I see. if they don't have progress they shouldn't be accounted for in the percentage anyway and be treated like 0 progress.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, exactly

Copy link
Contributor

@moesterheld moesterheld left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One possible issue, please check the comment

@todvora todvora merged commit 73e0b4e into master Aug 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@todvora todvora deleted the fix/parse_remote_reindex_task_response branch August 9, 2024 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants