-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(index): support SQL to specify inverted index columns #4929
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(index): support SQL to specify inverted index columns #4929
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
601b6fb
to
78d9243
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4929 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.17% 83.97% -0.20%
==========================================
Files 1137 1137
Lines 210050 210227 +177
==========================================
- Hits 176808 176540 -268
- Misses 33242 33687 +445 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rest LGTM.
We may consider adding support for specifying this in the "column constrain" position in a follow-up PR
/// Key used to store fulltext options in gRPC column options. | ||
const FULLTEXT_GRPC_KEY: &str = "fulltext"; | ||
/// Key used to store inverted index options in gRPC column options. | ||
const INVERTED_INDEX_GRPC_KEY: &str = "inverted_index"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
random think: no grpc key for vector index(
pub fn is_inverted_indexed(&self) -> bool { | ||
self.metadata | ||
.get(INVERTED_INDEX_KEY) | ||
.map(|v| v == "true") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we ignore case in this comparison?
let pk_as_inverted_index = !self | ||
.version | ||
.metadata | ||
.column_metadatas | ||
.iter() | ||
.any(|c| c.column_schema.has_inverted_index_key()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be better to put this "default" logic on someplace closer to protocol layer rather than on storage engine layer?
@@ -292,6 +277,35 @@ impl<'a> IndexerBuilder<'a> { | |||
|
|||
None | |||
} | |||
|
|||
fn inverted_indexed_column_ids(&self) -> HashSet<ColumnId> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems duplicated with the one in ScanRegion
Do we consider the compatibility with the old data? @zhongzc |
I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.
Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)
What's changed and what's your intention?
Allow specifying inverted index columns and support the following scenarios:
SQL statement example:
Checklist