-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml +semver:minor #176
Conversation
π Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
WalkthroughThe pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Poem
π Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI π Files selected for processing (1)
π€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
β° Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request removes the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow file, No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified IssuesNo issues were identified in the incoming changes as the file has been completely removed. ExplanationSince the file Missing TestsAs the change involves the removal of a file, there are no new functionalities or modifications to existing code that require additional tests. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.
|
Feedback
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Could you provide context on why the Snorkell documentation automation is being removed? This would help reviewers understand the impact on documentation maintenance.
- Removing an internal workflow file is typically considered a patch-level change rather than a minor version bump, since it doesn't affect the public API or add new features. Consider changing to +semver:patch
Here's what I looked at during the review
- π’ General issues: all looks good
- π’ Security: all looks good
- π’ Testing: all looks good
- π’ Complexity: all looks good
- π’ Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click π or π on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! π» Scan logs10:23AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:23AM INF 175 commits scanned.
10:23AM INF scan completed in 398ms
10:23AM INF no leaks found
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a π or π on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
β
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions β Issue Categories
β
Category Enabled Naming β Database Operations β Documentation β Logging β Error Handling β Systems and Environment β Objects and Data Structures β Readability and Maintainability β Asynchronous Processing β Design Patterns β Third-Party Libraries β Performance β Security β Functionality β Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects π
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
This pull request is ready β for merge/squash. |
2 similar comments
This pull request is ready β for merge/squash. |
This pull request is ready β for merge/squash. |
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
π Description
Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
Summary by Sourcery
CI:
Summary by CodeRabbit