Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml +semver:minor #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 17, 2025

πŸ“‘ Description

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Remove the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed GitHub Actions workflow for automated AI documentation generation.

Copy link

Review changes with Β SemanticDiff

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Jan 17, 2025

πŸ‘‹ Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml. This workflow was previously configured to automate documentation generation using an AI client on the main branch. The removal eliminates the automated documentation process that relied on the Snorkell documentation client, which required specific authentication secrets to generate and submit documentation updates.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Workflow file completely removed; AI-driven documentation automation deleted

Poem

🐰 Farewell, workflow of digital might,
Docs generated in the GitHub night.
Snorkell's client, now silent and still,
No more automation's coding thrill.
A rabbit waves goodbye with glee! πŸ“œβœ¨


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5839d51 and c63acdd.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml (0 hunks)
πŸ’€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request removes the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow file, .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removed the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow.
  • Deleted the workflow file entirely.
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake πŸ€ͺTypo 🚨Security πŸš€Performance πŸ’ͺBest Practices πŸ“–Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

  • βž– Removed the .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml file.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the incoming changes as the file has been completely removed.

Explanation

Since the file .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml has been deleted, there are no lines of code to analyze for potential issues. Therefore, there is no need for further explanation or code fixes.

Missing Tests

As the change involves the removal of a file, there are no new functionalities or modifications to existing code that require additional tests.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
I'd love to hear your feedback! React or reply.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.

  1. Loss of Automation:
    • File Path: .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
    • Issue: The complete deletion of the documentation workflow removes any automated process that generates AI-driven documentation. This could lead to increased manual effort and inconsistency in documentation practices, ultimately affecting the project's maintainability.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.

  1. Consider Version Control of Workflows:

    • File Path: .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
    • Suggestion: Instead of deleting the workflow, consider version-controlling it. You could comment out certain steps or add a flag to disable execution temporarily. This preserves the information and allows for easier re-enabling of the workflow in the future if it is deemed necessary again.
  2. Document Reason for Deletion:

    • File Path: N/A (because it is a deletion)
    • Suggestion: If a workflow is removed, it’s good practice to include a comment or an issue reference in the commit message explaining why it was removed. This helps future maintainers understand the decision without needing to dig through the version history.

Copy link

instapr bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Feedback

  • Code changes look good
  • PR description matches the changes made
  • Documentation removed as expected
  • No newline at end of file maintained

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5839d51..c63acdd. View details on DeepSourceΒ β†—.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource SQL LogoSQLβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverageβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecretsβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource PHP LogoPHPβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—
DeepSource Docker LogoDockerβœ…Β SuccessView CheckΒ β†—

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePhp
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage33.3%33.3%
Line Coverage33.3%33.3%

πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Could you provide context on why the Snorkell documentation automation is being removed? This would help reviewers understand the impact on documentation maintenance.
  • Removing an internal workflow file is typically considered a patch-level change rather than a minor version bump, since it doesn't affect the public API or add new features. Consider changing to +semver:patch
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟒 Security: all looks good
  • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs
10:23AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:23AM INF 175 commits scanned.
10:23AM INF scan completed in 398ms
10:23AM INF no leaks found

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings ​
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions βœ…
Issue Categories ​
Category Enabled
Naming βœ…
Database Operations βœ…
Documentation βœ…
Logging βœ…
Error Handling βœ…
Systems and Environment βœ…
Objects and Data Structures βœ…
Readability and Maintainability βœ…
Asynchronous Processing βœ…
Design Patterns βœ…
Third-Party Libraries βœ…
Performance βœ…
Security βœ…
Functionality βœ…

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects πŸŽ‰

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from gstraccini January 17, 2025 10:24
Copy link
Contributor

gstraccini bot commented Jan 17, 2025

This pull request is ready βœ… for merge/squash.

2 similar comments
Copy link
Contributor

gstraccini bot commented Jan 17, 2025

This pull request is ready βœ… for merge/squash.

Copy link
Contributor

gstraccini bot commented Jan 17, 2025

This pull request is ready βœ… for merge/squash.

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 19db9d1 into main Jan 17, 2025
26 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch January 17, 2025 12:03
Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants