More on renaming WG to Activity Area #1613
Conversation
eduardo-rodrigues
changed the title
|
Hi @eduardo-rodrigues - thanks a lot for doing this. I am generally favourable, but I think in many of the cases "X Activity Area" can just be "X Activity". It's a bit less of a mouthful. e.g., The Detector Simulation Working Group considers approaches to making... -> The Detector Simulation Activity considers approaches to making... What do you think? |
|
Yes, there are places where one could be shorter and omit "Area". I was not sure. In other places "group" is the right word, because it stands for "group of people". |
|
I just added another commit that corrects the SG mandate, which still mentioned WGs a lot |
These links are no longer valid, so remove them and note that they are not available
| with the aid of software tools such as code editors, static/dynamic code analysers, compilers, debuggers, performance analysers and so on. | ||
| The group plans to accomplish this by mainly serving as a forum where developers can share their experiences, discuss new/existing tools they utilise, | ||
| and learn from each other. To that point, contributions from the entire community are strongly encouraged. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Packaging | ||
|
|
||
| The group has a particular focus also on solutions for building and deploying software stacks, through the evolution of the previous *HSF Packaging Working Group* | ||
| The group has a particular focus also on solutions for building and deploying software stacks, through the evolution of the previous *HSF Packaging Working Group*. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we should talk about this area instead of a group
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I left "group" in a few places as in "group of people", but happy with a change. I have no strong feeling here.
|
|
||
| ### Packaging Goals | ||
|
|
||
| The aim of this working group is to foster communication and exchange among the experiments' librarians. We have identified various topics to work on, including | ||
| The aim of this group is to foster communication and exchange among the experiments' librarians. We have identified various topics to work on, including |
| @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ adaption of simulation techniques to modern computing hardware | |||
| (covering, e.g., multithreading, vectorisation and different accelerator | |||
| technologies) are an important area of work. | |||
|
|
|||
| [Mandate]({{ site.baseurl }}/organization/working-group-mandates.html). | |||
| [Mandate for Working Groups from 2018]({{ site.baseurl }}/organization/working-group-mandates.html). | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this the best thing to do? I only see the original mandate linked from here and the Reco & Trigger page. Should one have the link somewhere for historical purposes and remove this and the similar link in the Reco & Trigger page?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any thoughts on this?
| with the aid of software tools such as code editors, static/dynamic code analysers, compilers, debuggers, performance analysers and so on. | ||
| The group plans to accomplish this by mainly serving as a forum where developers can share their experiences, discuss new/existing tools they utilise, | ||
| and learn from each other. To that point, contributions from the entire community are strongly encouraged. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Packaging | ||
|
|
||
| The group has a particular focus also on solutions for building and deploying software stacks, through the evolution of the previous *HSF Packaging Working Group* | ||
| The group has a particular focus also on solutions for building and deploying software stacks, through the evolution of the previous *HSF Packaging Working Group*. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I left "group" in a few places as in "group of people", but happy with a change. I have no strong feeling here.
Let me know what you think of these follow-up changes that I noticed were missing.
In short I renamed "Working Group" to "Activity Area" and in some text where "working group" is mentioned I simply left "group", as in "group a people", which seems OK. But one could be more aggressive.