Add CheckItem component and update Vote component with new styles #41
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new React functional component named Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VoteComponent
participant CheckItem
User->>VoteComponent: Interacts with input fields
VoteComponent->>CheckItem: Renders CheckItem components for validation
CheckItem-->>VoteComponent: Displays validation status
VoteComponent->>User: Shows updated validation feedback
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 4547ac6): https://waldorfwahlen--pr41-feat-redesign-3g2vgdpq.web.app (expires Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:53:43 GMT) 🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎 Sign: 29598eeceef3a0396a20fa770c02232c60673862 |
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/CheckItem.tsx (1)
3-16: Consider memoizing the componentSince this component is used in a list rendering context, consider memoizing it to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
-export default function CheckItem({ label, checked }) { +import { memo } from 'react'; + +const CheckItem = memo(function CheckItem({ label, checked }) { if (checked) { return ( <mdui-checkbox disabled checked checked-icon="done"> {label} </mdui-checkbox> ); } return ( <mdui-checkbox disabled unchecked-icon="close"> {label} </mdui-checkbox> ); -} +}); + +export default CheckItem;🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 3-3: 'label' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 3-3: 'checked' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
src/styles.css (2)
97-100: Consider a more accessible flex-break solutionThe current .break class implementation might cause issues with screen readers. Consider using margins or padding instead.
.break { flex-basis: 100%; - height: 0; + min-height: 1rem; }
455-455: Add transition for border changesThe border changes on .option-card selection might appear abrupt. Consider adding a smooth transition.
.option-card { + transition: border-color 0.3s ease; border: 5px solid transparent; }src/Vote.jsx (2)
418-422: Move inline styles to CSS classConsider moving the inline styles to a CSS class for better maintainability and performance.
+// Add to styles.css +.checks { + display: flex; + flex-wrap: wrap; + justify-content: center; +} -<div - className="checks" - style={{ - display: "flex", - flexWrap: "wrap", - justifyContent: "center", - }} -> +<div className="checks">
424-427: Standardize null checksThe null checks for firstName are inconsistent. Consider using a more consistent approach.
-firstName?.trim() && firstName.length >= 2 +firstName?.trim()?.length >= 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/CheckItem.tsx(1 hunks)src/Vote.jsx(5 hunks)src/styles.css(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/CheckItem.tsx
[error] 1-1: 'React' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
[error] 3-3: 'label' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 3-3: 'checked' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/Vote.jsx
[error] 292-293: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 443-445: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
| export default function CheckItem({ label, checked }) { | ||
| if (checked) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <mdui-checkbox disabled checked checked-icon="done"> | ||
| {label} | ||
| </mdui-checkbox> | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| return ( | ||
| <mdui-checkbox disabled unchecked-icon="close"> | ||
| {label} | ||
| </mdui-checkbox> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript types and prop validation
The component lacks type definitions for its props. Consider adding TypeScript interfaces or prop-types validation.
-export default function CheckItem({ label, checked }) {
+interface CheckItemProps {
+ label: string;
+ checked: boolean;
+}
+
+export default function CheckItem({ label, checked }: CheckItemProps) {For non-TypeScript environments, add prop-types:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
CheckItem.propTypes = {
label: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
checked: PropTypes.bool.isRequired
};🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 3-3: 'label' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 3-3: 'checked' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
| <h2 ref={(el) => (refs.current[index] = el)}> | ||
| <h2 | ||
| style={{ textAlign: "center" }} | ||
| ref={(el) => (refs.current[index] = el)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid ref assignments in JSX expressions
The ref assignment in the JSX expression could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider moving it to useEffect.
+const headingRefs = useRef([]);
+
+useEffect(() => {
+ refs.current = headingRefs.current;
+}, []);
-ref={(el) => (refs.current[index] = el)}
+ref={(el) => (headingRefs.current[index] = el)}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 292-293: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
| <> | ||
| <CheckItem | ||
| key={i} | ||
| label={e} | ||
| checked={extraFieldsValues[i]?.trim()} | ||
| /> | ||
| <div className="break" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing key prop to mapped elements
The fragment in the extraFields map is missing a key prop, which could cause React reconciliation issues.
-<>
+<React.Fragment key={i}>
<CheckItem
- key={i}
label={e}
checked={extraFieldsValues[i]?.trim()}
/>
<div className="break" />
-</>
+</React.Fragment>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <> | |
| <CheckItem | |
| key={i} | |
| label={e} | |
| checked={extraFieldsValues[i]?.trim()} | |
| /> | |
| <div className="break" /> | |
| </> | |
| ))} | |
| <React.Fragment key={i}> | |
| <CheckItem | |
| label={e} | |
| checked={extraFieldsValues[i]?.trim()} | |
| /> | |
| <div className="break" /> | |
| </React.Fragment> | |
| ))} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 443-445: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
…ayout with flexbox
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/Vote.jsx (3)
18-18: Consider maintaining HTML5 validation alongside CheckItem feedbackWhile the CheckItem components provide good visual feedback, removing HTML5 validation (
requiredattribute) eliminates a layer of native browser validation. Consider keeping both for better user experience and accessibility.<mdui-text-field label="Vorname(n)" placeholder="Max Erika" value={firstName} onInput={(e) => setFirstName(capitalizeWords(e.target.value))} icon="person" + required ></mdui-text-field>Also applies to: 237-271
314-319: Simplify complex conditional styling logicThe nested conditional expressions for cursor and backgroundColor make the code harder to maintain. Consider extracting this logic into a helper function.
+ const getOptionCardStyles = (isSelected, isDisabled) => ({ + cursor: isDisabled ? "not-allowed" : "pointer", + backgroundColor: isDisabled ? "rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5)" : undefined + }); + const isOptionDisabled = (currentSelection, optionId) => + currentSelection !== optionId && selected.includes(optionId); - style={{ - cursor: selected[index] !== e.id && selected.includes(e.id) - ? "not-allowed" - : "pointer", - backgroundColor: selected[index] !== e.id && - selected.includes(e.id) && - "rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5)", - }} + style={getOptionCardStyles( + selected[index] === e.id, + isOptionDisabled(selected[index], e.id) + )}
341-352: Improve badge contrast and accessibilityThe current badge styling with transparent background and white text might not provide sufficient contrast in all scenarios. Consider using theme-aware colors or ensuring WCAG compliance.
<mdui-badge style={{ - backgroundColor: "transparent", - color: "white", + backgroundColor: "var(--mdui-color-primary-container)", + color: "var(--mdui-color-on-primary-container)", }} >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Vote.jsx(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/Vote.jsx
[error] 298-299: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 449-451: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Vote.jsx (2)
298-298: Avoid ref assignments in JSX expressions
This issue was previously identified. The ref assignment in JSX expressions could lead to unexpected behavior.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 298-299: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
442-451:
Fix React key prop and improve layout structure
The current implementation has missing key props and uses break elements for layout. This could cause React reconciliation issues and isn't the most maintainable approach.
{extraFields?.map((e, i) => (
- <>
+ <React.Fragment key={i}>
<CheckItem
- key={i}
label={e}
checked={extraFieldsValues[i]?.trim()}
/>
- <div className="break" />
+ <div className="check-item-spacer" />
+ </React.Fragment>
- </>
))}Consider using CSS Grid or Flexbox with gap properties instead of break elements for layout.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 449-451: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
| <div | ||
| className="checks" | ||
| style={{ | ||
| display: "flex", | ||
| flexWrap: "wrap", | ||
| justifyContent: "center", | ||
| }} | ||
| > | ||
| <CheckItem | ||
| label={"Vorname(n)"} | ||
| checked={firstName?.trim() && firstName.length >= 2} | ||
| /> | ||
| <CheckItem | ||
| label={"Nachname"} | ||
| checked={lastName?.trim() && lastName.length >= 2} | ||
| /> | ||
| <div className="break" /> | ||
| <CheckItem label={"Klasse"} checked={grade} /> | ||
| <CheckItem label={"Klassenlistennr."} checked={listIndex} /> | ||
| <div className="break" /> | ||
| {extraFields?.map((e, i) => ( | ||
| <> | ||
| <CheckItem | ||
| key={i} | ||
| label={e} | ||
| checked={extraFieldsValues[i]?.trim()} | ||
| /> | ||
| <div className="break" /> | ||
| </> | ||
| ))} | ||
| {Array.from({ length: selectCount }).map((e, index) => ( | ||
| <CheckItem | ||
| key={index} | ||
| label={`${index + 1}. Wahl`} | ||
| checked={selected[index] !== "null"} | ||
| /> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Centralize validation logic
The validation logic is duplicated between submitDisabled and individual CheckItem components. Consider creating a centralized validation state manager.
+ const validationRules = {
+ firstName: (value) => value?.trim() && value.length >= 2,
+ lastName: (value) => value?.trim() && value.length >= 2,
+ grade: (value) => Boolean(value),
+ listIndex: (value) => Boolean(value),
+ extraFields: (values, fields) =>
+ values?.length === fields?.length &&
+ values?.every(value => value?.trim()),
+ selections: (selected) => !selected.includes("null")
+ };
+ const validationState = {
+ firstName: validationRules.firstName(firstName),
+ lastName: validationRules.lastName(lastName),
+ grade: validationRules.grade(grade),
+ listIndex: validationRules.listIndex(listIndex),
+ extraFields: validationRules.extraFields(extraFieldsValues, extraFields),
+ selections: validationRules.selections(selected)
+ };
- const submitDisabled = () => {
- if (
- selected.includes("null") ||
- !firstName?.trim() ||
- // ... existing conditions
- ) {
- return true;
- }
- return false;
- };
+ const submitDisabled = () => {
+ return !Object.values(validationState).every(Boolean) || preview;
+ };Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 449-451: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CheckItemcomponent for visual feedback on input validation.Votecomponent withCheckItemintegration for improved user experience.Bug Fixes
Style