Enhance Answers and Match Components in Admin Voting Interface #43
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@JohanGrims has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve enhancements to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Answers
participant Firestore
User->>Answers: Select filter parameters (grade, listIndex)
Answers->>Answers: Update state with new parameters
Answers->>Firestore: Fetch filtered answers
Firestore-->>Answers: Return filtered answers
Answers->>User: Display answers based on selected criteria
User->>Answers: Update an answer
Answers->>Firestore: Call updateAnswer
Firestore-->>Answers: Confirm update
Answers->>User: Show snackbar notification
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
coderabbitai
bot
changed the title
|
Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 4f345de): https://waldorfwahlen--pr43-feat-edit-answer-v5u2j3l5.web.app (expires Thu, 19 Dec 2024 19:47:52 GMT) 🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎 Sign: 29598eeceef3a0396a20fa770c02232c60673862 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx (1)
524-524: Remove unused variableiin the.map()functionThe variable
iis defined but never used in the.map()function, which may cause linting errors.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- .map((answer, i) => ( + .map((answer) => (🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 524-524: 'i' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
src/admin/vote/Match.tsx (1)
Line range hint
60-80: Optimize filtering by storing the result in a variableCurrently, you're calling
choices.filter()multiple times with the same condition, which can be inefficient. Storing the filtered choices in a variable improves performance and readability.Refactor the code as follows:
+ const filteredChoices = choices.filter( + (choice) => + choice.listIndex === s.listIndex.toString() && + choice.grade === c.grade.toString() + ); <Link to={`../answers?grade=${c.grade}&listIndex=${s.listIndex}`} > - { - choices.filter( - (choice) => - choice.listIndex === s.listIndex.toString() && - choice.grade === c.grade.toString() - )[0]?.name - } + {filteredChoices[0]?.name} {filteredChoices.length > 1 && " + " + (filteredChoices.length - 1) + " weitere"} </Link>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx(9 hunks)src/admin/vote/Match.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx
[error] 524-524: 'i' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx (2)
21-24: Consider consolidating URL parameter handlingThe repeated URLSearchParams instantiation can be optimized.
- const search = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get("search"); - const grade = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get("grade"); - const listIndex = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get( - "listIndex" - ); + const searchParams = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search); + const search = searchParams.get("search"); + const grade = searchParams.get("grade"); + const listIndex = searchParams.get("listIndex");
547-555: Optimize date formatting performanceThe date formatting is performed multiple times for the same timestamp.
+ const formattedDate = answer.timestamp + ? new Date(answer.timestamp.seconds * 1000) + : null; <mdui-tooltip - content={new Date( - answer.timestamp.seconds * 1000 - ).toLocaleString("de-DE")} + content={formattedDate?.toLocaleString("de-DE") || "Zeitstempel nicht verfügbar"} trigger="click" > <span> - {new Date( - answer.timestamp.seconds * 1000 - ).toLocaleDateString("de-DE")} + {formattedDate?.toLocaleDateString("de-DE") || "Datum nicht verfügbar"} </span> </mdui-tooltip>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx
[error] 531-531: 'i' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/admin/vote/Answers.jsx (2)
105-126: LGTM! Well-implemented error handling and state management
The updateAnswer function is well-structured with:
- Proper async/await usage with try/catch
- Appropriate error messages and logging
- Correct state updates preserving existing fields
529-531:
Add null checks and remove unused parameter
The code needs defensive programming for timestamp handling and has an unused parameter.
{answers
- .sort((a, b) => b.timestamp.seconds - a.timestamp.seconds)
- .map((answer, i) => (
+ .sort((a, b) => (b.timestamp?.seconds || 0) - (a.timestamp?.seconds || 0))
+ .map((answer) => (Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 531-531: 'i' is defined but never used.
(no-unused-vars)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes