Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: PhyLibrary v0.1.0 #117197

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: 9acac36b-edab-401e-8075-823f9c00cb12
Repo: https://github.com/lliu1871/PhyLibrary.git
Tree: 443f24e4f56aa5c957cf08c977de4d15fb1ed990

Registrator tree SHA: 191228b6dd8b9d0e2965ae3e705fe54c51dcfee8
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines which are not met ❌

  • Repo URL does not end with /name.jl.git, where name is the package name

  • There is no compat entry for julia.

  • The following dependencies do not have a [compat] entry that is upper-bounded and only includes a finite number of breaking releases: CSV, Combinatorics, DataFrames, Distributions, FreqTables, HypothesisTests, StatsBase, Tables

    Extended explanation

    Your package has a Project.toml file which might look something like the following:

    name = "YourPackage"
    uuid = "random id"
    authors = ["Author Names"]
    version = "major.minor"
    
    [deps]
    # Package dependencies
    # ...
    
    [compat]
    # ...

    Every package listed in [deps], along with julia itself, must also be listed under [compat] (if you don't have a [compat] section, make one!). See the Pkg docs for the syntax for compatibility bounds, and this documentation for more on the kinds of compat bounds required for AutoMerge.

  • No licenses detected in the package's top-level folder. An OSI-approved license is required.

3. Needs action: here's what to do next

  1. Please try to update your package to conform to these guidelines. The General registry's README has an FAQ that can help figure out how to do so.
  2. After you have fixed the AutoMerge issues, simply retrigger Registrator, the same way you did in the initial registration. This will automatically update this pull request. You do not need to change the version number in your Project.toml file (unless the AutoMerge issue is that you skipped a version number).

If you need help fixing the AutoMerge issues, or want your pull request to be manually merged instead, please post a comment explaining what you need help with or why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. Then, send a message to the #pkg-registration channel in the public Julia Slack for better visibility.

4. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Oct 13, 2024

Thank you for submitting your package! However, please make sure to add some documentation before registering. At the very least, that would be a description of the package's purpose and a small usage example in the README.

I would also ask for a longer, more descriptive package name. Every Julia package is a "library", so the word Library is usually superfluous in a package name, and Phy would not be commonly understood to refer to "phylogenetic". Assuming the package is well-documented (and all the issues flagged by the bot are addressed), PhylogeneticInference would probably be a suitable package name.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants