-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add tests for clCommandSVMMemcpyKHR & clCommandSVMMemfillKHR #1821
Conversation
CI is failing because it's missing |
test_conformance/extensions/cl_khr_command_buffer/svm_command_basic.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test_conformance/extensions/cl_khr_command_buffer/command_buffer_test_copy.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few minor things but LGTM. I've not tried this patch against an implementation that supports this, but it skips correctly for a command-buffer implementation without SVM.
test_conformance/extensions/cl_khr_command_buffer/svm_command_basic.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test_conformance/extensions/cl_khr_command_buffer/svm_command_basic.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mostly LGTM. I've added support for these functions to the command buffer emulation layer and these news tests are passing.
test_conformance/extensions/cl_khr_command_buffer/svm_command_basic.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test_conformance/extensions/cl_khr_command_buffer/svm_command_basic.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
016d693
to
54b32f3
Compare
Merging as discussed in the October 10th teleconference. |
No description provided.