Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove SonarCloud code analysis on develop/master #293

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bigspider
Copy link
Collaborator

The CI is red if SonarCloud's reported code coverage is insufficient; since a lot of code is tested in the python integration tests, rather than the C unit tests, this happens way too often to be useful.

This PR removes the SonarCloud job on the develop and master branches, while keeping it for PRs as it might still provide useful info.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 8, 2024

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.76%. Comparing base (c9144de) to head (3824880).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #293   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.76%   84.76%           
========================================
  Files           17       17           
  Lines         2186     2186           
========================================
  Hits          1853     1853           
  Misses         333      333           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.76% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bigspider bigspider merged commit b582f55 into develop Oct 8, 2024
145 checks passed
@bigspider bigspider deleted the no-sonar branch October 8, 2024 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants