Skip to content

Merge pull request #7 from weex/nip99 #81

Merge pull request #7 from weex/nip99

Merge pull request #7 from weex/nip99 #81

Triggered via push October 28, 2023 14:21
Status Success
Total duration 1m 14s
Artifacts

dotnet-core.yml

on: push
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

11 warnings
build
The following actions uses node12 which is deprecated and will be forced to run on node16: actions/checkout@v2, actions/setup-dotnet@v1. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-13-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node16-instead-of-node12-by-default/
build: test_integration/Nostr.Client.Sample.Console/Program.cs#L131
The local function 'SendEvent' is declared but never used
build: test_integration/Nostr.Client.Sample.Console/Program.cs#L146
The local function 'SendDirectMessage' is declared but never used
build: apps/nostr-bot/NostrBot.Web/Utils/TaskUtils.cs#L11
The variable 'e' is declared but never used
build: apps/nostr-bot/NostrBot.Web/Logic/BotManagement.cs#L32
This async method lacks 'await' operators and will run synchronously. Consider using the 'await' operator to await non-blocking API calls, or 'await Task.Run(...)' to do CPU-bound work on a background thread.
build: test/Nostr.Client.Tests/NostrMultiClientTests.cs#L73
Do not use Assert.True() to check if a value exists in a collection. Use Assert.Contains instead. (https://xunit.net/xunit.analyzers/rules/xUnit2012)
build: test/Nostr.Client.Tests/NostrMultiClientTests.cs#L102
Do not use Assert.True() to check if a value exists in a collection. Use Assert.Contains instead. (https://xunit.net/xunit.analyzers/rules/xUnit2012)
build: test/Nostr.Client.Tests/NostrMultiClientTests.cs#L111
Do not use Assert.False() to check if a value exists in a collection. Use Assert.DoesNotContain instead. (https://xunit.net/xunit.analyzers/rules/xUnit2012)
build: apps/nostr-debug/NostrDebug.Web/Events/NostrFilterEdit.razor#L226
The variable 'e' is declared but never used
build: apps/nostr-debug/NostrDebug.Web/Events/NostrKindSelect.razor#L68
This async method lacks 'await' operators and will run synchronously. Consider using the 'await' operator to await non-blocking API calls, or 'await Task.Run(...)' to do CPU-bound work on a background thread.
build: apps/nostr-debug/NostrDebug.Web/Events/NostrEventTable.razor#L20
Dereference of a possibly null reference.